LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

New approach to green power 

Credit:  Carl Clutchey | The Chronicle Journal | Friday, May 31, 2013 | www.chroniclejournal.com ~~

The province promised Thursday to give municipalities more opportunities to get involved in the creation of clean-energy projects.

But cities and towns that don’t want a wind or solar farm in their backyards still won’t be able to say no to them by denying zoning changes.

“The changes we’re making to the procurement process will provide municipalities with a stronger role going forward, but will not provide a veto,” Energy Ministry spokeswoman Kirby Dier said in an email.

The new approach “will engage municipalities from the beginning to identify appropriate locations and siting requirements for future large renewable energy projects,” Dier added.

The changes announced by Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli, a former Ottawa mayor, fall short of what some municipalities had been seeking earlier this year.

Neebing Mayor Ziggy Polkowski supported a Conservative bill that would restore the power of municipalities to approve or turn down zoning change proposals to accommodate energy projects.

“We can’t have these things being decided in Toronto – we have to have a say,” Polkowski has said.

When the Liberals brought in the Green Energy Act four years ago, clean-energy proponents started to bypass municipalities and deal directly with the province to determime project locations.

Though that didn’t change in Thursday’s announcement, Chiarelli said the province will “work with municipalities to determine a property tax rate increase for wind turbine towers’’ and “give priority to projects partnered or led by municipalities.”

The group opposing Horizon Wind’s proposal to build eight wind turbines on the Nor’Westers escarpment west of Thunder Bay on 7,000 hectares of city-owned land, said Thursday’s announcement “is a step in the right direction.”

But Nor’Wester Mountain Escarpment Protection Committee president John Beals wondered if the new approach could impact future input by interest groups into Horizon’s long-term plan for an additional eight turbines on the escarpment.

“Does this mean (Horizon) has to go back to square one? We don’t know,” said Beals.

The City of Thunder Bay appears to be locked into a 25-year lease with Horizon that allows for a 20-year extension on the 7,000 hectares (located in Neebing Township).

In April 2011, the city avoided a $126-million lawsuit by Horizon when city council voted 8-4 in favour of amendments to the original lease agreement for the land.

The Ministry of Environment last month deemed Horizon’s $50-million plan for the first eight turbines to be “complete.” The company has said it believes construction could begin as early this fall if permits are granted.

Thunder Bay Mayor Keith Hobbs, who has opposed the wind farm at its current location, was out of the city on business Thursday and couldn’t be reached.

The Association of Municipalities of Ontario praised Chiarelli’s announcement.

“Today’s announcement gives Ontario’s municipalities a better sense of how the province intends to approach large renewable energy projects differently, with greater local input and a focus on more willing communities,” AMO president Russ Power said in a news release.

“We’re looking forward to meaningful consultation with the province on these issues.”

Source:  Carl Clutchey | The Chronicle Journal | Friday, May 31, 2013 | www.chroniclejournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon