LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

‘Friends’ get go-ahead for wind farm appeal 

Credit:  Paula Levy, 28 May 2013 | www.southshorenow.ca ~~

CHESTER – The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (URB) has ruled that a residents’ group and Homburg Land Bank Corporation have the right to appeal a proposed wind farm.

The groups are appealing a development agreement between the Municipality of Chester and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, Minas Basin Pulp and Power Limited and Oxford Frozen Foods Limited to construct a wind turbine facility known as the South Canoe Project. The $200-million wind farm would see the development of 34 turbines on a 3,044-hectare property.

But the municipality and the developers asked the URB to quash the appeal stating the Friends and Homburg are not “aggrieved persons” according to the Municipal Government Act. On May 16, the URB heard submissions from all parties.

Last week the URB issued a ruling disagreeing with the municipality and the developers, finding instead that the Friends of South Canoe and Homburg Land Bank Corporation did, in fact, meet the definition of an “aggrieved person.”

“While the board agrees that the grounds advanced by the Friends … are not perfectly framed, it has concluded that sufficient substance is contained within them to … support their appeal,” wrote the URB in its decision.

As a result, the public hearing will proceed on May 30 at 10 a.m. and June 3 at 6:30 p.m. at the New Ross fire hall.

The Friends has reported that the appeal “focuses on the lack of consideration by council of the impacts on health and property values of the development on the surrounding members of the community and properties.”

Source:  Paula Levy, 28 May 2013 | www.southshorenow.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon