LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents voice fears at Asfordby windfarm inquiry 

Credit:  Melton Times | 16 May 2013 | www.meltontimes.co.uk ~~

Worried residents turned out in force last night (Wednesday, May 15) to voice their fierce opposition to the Asfordby windfarm at a public session as part of the inquiry.

About 80 residents attended the session, with 12 individual speakers giving their reasons why they’re strongly opposed to the proposed windfarm. No-one spoke up in favour of Peel Energy’s proposal for nine turbines up to 125m in height on the former Asfordby mine site.

Residents who gave their objections were from Melton, Holwell, Wymondham, Saxelbye, Frisby-on-the-Wreake, Ab Kettleby, Twyford, Wartnaby and Normanton, near Bottesford. Also among the speakers was Peter Finch, on behalf of the Leicestershire Campaign to Protect Rural England.

Among the concerns raised were the impact the windfarm would have on the rural landscape, residential amenity and heritage assets, noise from the turbines, impact on those using bridleways and rights of way and the unsuitable location for a windfarm.

Peel is arguing that the stated reasons for turning its application down – impact on the landscape and heritage assets – were insufficient grounds for refusal while councillors had also gone against their own planning officer’s recommendation.

Alastair Eperon, a Holwell resident for about 20 years, said: “The proposed development would have deeply shocking and transformational impact upon this environment. The turbines will loom very high on the horizon and completely destroy landscape views.

“We’re also concerned that the familiar sounds of bird song and rustling trees will be obliterated by humming pylons.”

Gill Musson, of Wymondham, said: “The height of the turbines will be more than four times that of the tower of St Mary’s Church in Melton and the spire of the 13th century churches in the villages.

“Vantage points, a view of nearly 360 degrees from the A607 above Frisby-on-the-Wreake, will be severely damaged by the proposed turbines.”

Rupert Marsh, of Saxelbye, pointed out the tallest turbine would only be 10m lower than the London Eye. He said: “The landscape will become insignificant. There’s a real risk that we will suffer from intrusive and disturbing noise at night and flicker during the day. From Grimston the turbines will over power the sky line and from the A6006 above Shoby they will dominate the approach to Melton.”

William Bissill, of Ab Kettleby, said: “As a local horse rider I feel the turbines will stop the use of the permissive bridleway and Welby Lane. As this is an area with high equestrian use, it’s a totally illogical place for this construction as the turbines are far too close to the highlighted areas and will cause an unacceptable risk of an accident from spooking horses.

“As a whole the turbines make this area impossible to enjoy from an equine and visual perspective, therefore making the turbines inappropriate and unwanted in this highly populated and scenic area.”

Dean Wriggall, of Wartnaby, added: “If Peel get their way we will have nine monstrous turbines in our eye line. They will destroy the visual luxury that we enjoy today.”

The inquiry, which is being held at the council’s former Phoenix House offices in Nottingham Road, continues. On Tuesday (May 21) the inquiry will begin to hear evidence on the subject of noise. Closing submissions from all parties concerned will be made next Friday (May 24).

Source:  Melton Times | 16 May 2013 | www.meltontimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky