LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Clarington an unwilling host to wind power; Council sends message to the Province over two planned wind farms 

Credit:  Jennifer O'Meara | May 14, 2013 | www.durhamregion.com ~~

CLARINGTON – Last-minute presentations by a wind farm developer and a doctor convinced there are no ill health effects from properly-sited turbines were not enough to tip the scales against a council chamber packed with residents opposed to the farms.

Clarington is officially an unwilling host to wind energy, after council passed the declaration at its Monday, May 13 meeting.

In her first throne speech, Premier Kathleen Wynne said Ontario could benefit from industrial wind farms only if there were willing hosts for the turbines. Shortly after, several communities passed resolutions to declare themselves “unwilling hosts” of wind farms.

Heather Rutherford, from Clarington Wind Concerns, asked Clarington council to do the same.

“We are hoping that the Premier of the province will take our concerns, and the concerns of other communities, into serious consideration when they make their decision,” said Ms. Rutherford. “We’re hoping that by passing this resolution tonight, it will send a clear message to Premier Wynne that Clarington does have some serious concerns about this project.”

Concerned residents have been vocally opposed to the two industrial wind farms planned for east Clarington.

Representatives from Sprott Power Corp., co-developing with Zero Emissions People, said the 20-megawatt, 10-turbine farm would have no “widespread” impact on property values. They said in the earlier stages of a wind farm, there has been some evidence of a drop in home values, but values do tend to rebound.

“They’re not saying there is no specific impacts on any house,” said David Eva. “But when the issue is studied broadly, the impact of wind farms on a community, these studies are not finding statistically significant impacts.”

Dr. Loren Knopper, a senior scientist with Intrinsik Environmental Sciences, told council that at the setbacks and noise restrictions proposed for the wind turbines in Clarington, people will not get sick. He said the change in environment and annoyance factors are a big part of why some residents report a range of symptoms – from sleep disturbances to ringing in the ears.

From reviewing studies done on the issue, Dr. Knopper said at the regulated noise limit, 40 decibels, the noise from the wind turbines has not been shown to cause health effects. He added many of the symptoms of “wind turbine syndrome” are common health complaints among many Canadians.

“I don’t discount it at all … I think stress, the subjective worry of it, can definitely lead to problems,” said Mr. Knopper.

Council members argued that if a resident was made sick, it hardly mattered whether it was noise or stress from wind turbines having an impact.

Last week Council did raise concerns that there may be places in Clarington – for example the Clarington Energy Park – where future wind energy could be welcomed. A staff report and letter from the Clarington Board of Trade said an all encompassing unwilling host resolution could hinder economic development.

The fact that the wind farms are moving ahead quickly, and the energy park is still under development, motivated council to declare Clarington an unwilling host of wind energy.

“I believe that despite your efforts, very few people here tonight would agree that you’ve addressed their concerns,” Mayor Adrian Foster told the wind energy company.

Source:  Jennifer O'Meara | May 14, 2013 | www.durhamregion.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky