LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

In reversal, PSC agrees to take second look at $250 million wind farm 

Credit:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel | May 2, 2013 | www.jsonline.com ~~

A developer’s plan to build a $250 million wind farm in western Wisconsin isn’t dead after all.

The state Public Service Commission on Thursday voted to approve developer Emerging Energies’ request for a rehearing, given new evidence the company submitted to show it can comply with Wisconsin’s wind turbine noise rules.

The PSC’s vote was 2-to-1. Phil Montgomery, the PSC chairman who had initially voted to reject the project, agreed to grant the request. He was supported by commissioner Eric Callisto and opposed by commissioner Ellen Nowak.

In a filing last month, Emerging Energies said it was providing new information demonstrating that it could comply with a 45-decibel noise standard at night for nearby homes.

The PSC previously voted to deny a construction permit for the wind farm, and then rejected an emergency request to allow Emerging Energies to demonstrate it could build a wind farm that complies with the state noise standard.

Nighttime curtailment of wind turbines for affected homeowners can be done to comply with the commission’s noise limit, said Tim Osterberg, one of the principals involved with developer.

Emerging Energies’ new analysis concluded that, depending on the turbine used, the overall electricity production from the project would be reduced by 1.6% or 4.5%, but that the restriction “will not negatively impact the project to a degree that makes the project uneconomic,” Osterberg said.

Source:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel | May 2, 2013 | www.jsonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky