LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Controversial wind turbine plans under attack 

Credit:  York Press | 30th April 2013 | www.yorkpress.co.uk ~~

Plans for new wind turbines in York have sparked controversy.

Several sites are earmarked in the city council’s new Local Plan, including between Bad Bargain Lane and Stockton Lane, in Heworth.

Local Liberal Democrat councillor Nigel Ayre said: “Local people will be deeply concerned about the impact these turbines could have on their area.

“In one breath the council cites the outlook from the A64 between Hull Road and Hopgrove towards the Minster as a unique area which defines the character of York, but in the next it plans to put 1,800 houses and 100-metre high wind turbines there.

“Renewable energy sites should only be considered in suitable locations and after extensive consultation with local residents.”

Labour’s Tracey Simpson-Laing, deputy council leader, said the Local Plan section on wind turbines was unchanged from the Lib Dems’ proposals in the previous Local Development Framework.

She said: “It seems that Coun Ayre is very keen to forget his own group’s policy, in opposition, when he thinks he can play political games with the future of York’s Local Plan.”

Martin Grainger, the council’s head of integrated strategy, said there would be an extensive consultation on the Local Plan and said the council wanted people’s views.

On the turbines, he said: “It is made clear in the document that proposals would only be allowed if it could be demonstrated that there will be no significant adverse impacts on landscape character, setting, views, heritage assets and Green Belt objectives and demonstrate benefits for local communities.”

Source:  York Press | 30th April 2013 | www.yorkpress.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky