LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plans for windfarm thrown out 

Plans for a small-scale windfarm on the outskirts of Stonehaven were yesterday thrown out by councillors due to air safety concerns.

Councillors from the Kincardine and Mearns area committee agreed in principle with the proposal to build four 256ft wind turbines on agricultural land at Clochnahill, four miles south of Stonehaven, but agreed that public safety was paramount.

Local authority planners recommended refusal of the proposals, which would produce enough energy to power almost 3,000 homes, because of its interference with operations at Aberdeen Airport.

The British Airports Authority said the scheme lies 18 miles south-west of the aerodrome reference point for Aberdeen Airport and the turbines could “cause false returns” on the air traffic controller screens resulting in planes having to be rerouted from the area.

Speaking at yesterday’s meeting, Douglas Gray, acting head of development control and building standards for Aberdeenshire Council, said: “The drawback with this application is unfortunately air traffic safety.

“This is really the crux of the matter. It is the only significant issues at fault with the application.

“With an issue such as air traffic safety I don’t think a planning officer can be cavalier enough to disregard these concerns.”

Applicant Hugh Gordon said the scheme would have a minimal impact on the environment and did not raise any health issues.

His sister Isobel Gordon added: “It is located just over a mile within the boundary of controlled air safety. Air safety will not be diminished.”

But Mearns North councillor George Swapp said the issue of air traffic safety was a serious matter.

Newtonhill, Muchalls and Cammachmore councillor Carl Nelson said: “It’s unfortunate really when community councils are supporting it and everyone seems to be very much in favour.

“But this is an extremely important matter concerning the safety of airplanes and air passengers.”

And Stonehaven South councillor Wendy Agnew said safety was not an issue to “play around with”.

By Amelia Whittaker

thisisnorthscotland.co.uk

21 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky