LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

DEP promises lengthy hearing for Bowers Mountain wind project 

Credit:  By Nick Sambides Jr., BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | April 22, 2013 | bangordailynews.com ~~

LEE, Maine – The state’s top environmental agency will set aside at least 16 hours for all participants to speak during a two-day public hearing on a 16-turbine industrial wind site proposed for Bowers Mountain, officials said Monday.

Project intervenors will have two full days of testimony and cross examination followed by night sessions for more public input at Lee Academy on April 30 and May 1, Maine DEP spokeswoman Samantha Warren said.

The public hearing is the first DEP has ever done for a proposed wind project, Warren said.

“We don’t do these sorts of hearing processes that often,” Warren said Monday. “The process is that all the parties involved get a full opportunity to ask questions, present evidence and answer questions as well.

“No one can say that the process isn’t thorough and inclusive, which is important to us,” Warren said.

Officials from Champlain Wind, LLC., a subsidiary of First Wind of Massachusetts, seek to build a 48-megawatt wind site atop Bowers Mountain. It is their second application seeking to build there. The first proposal was denied by the Land Use Regulation Commission in April 2012 in the first significant victory against a wind developer by a Maine anti-wind group since they started fighting projects almost seven years ago.

Opposing intervenors will include registered Maine Master Guide David Corrigan and representatives of the Partnership for the Preservation of the Downeast Lakes Watershed. The Conservation Law Foundation and the Maine Renewable Energy Associates are among the supporting intervenors.

Intervenor status allows those who receive the designation to be a formal party to the process, providing an opportunity for participation beyond what is typically afforded to the public, including the opportunity to present evidence under oath and cross examine other parties.

Absent a lunch hour and some 15-minute breaks, the intervenors will present their cases about the project from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on both days. Public hearings for other interested parties will start at 6 p.m. on both days. The night hearings are open-ended in an effort to hear from all speakers, Warren said.

“We want it to be very transparent and inclusive,” Warren said of the process. “People may not like the ultimate decision but they can be sure that the process is fair.”

Maine Renewable describes itself as “a not-for-profit association of renewable energy producers, suppliers of goods and services to those producers, and other supporters” of the wind industry, according to its website, renewablemaine.org.

Opponents fear the development would have negative scenic and economic effects on the residents and businesses near the project, and that the applicant’s decommissioning plan and financial capacity are deficient, according to documents filed with DEP.

Opponents believe the project would mar the beauty of one of the most precious natural environments in Maine. PPDLW leader Gary Campbell did not immediately return a message seeking comment on Monday.

First Wind spokesman John Lamontagne said the company had reduced by 40 percent the project’s footprint, taking it from 27 to 16 turbines in response to LURC’s denying the first proposal for its scenic effects.

Source:  By Nick Sambides Jr., BDN Staff | Bangor Daily News | April 22, 2013 | bangordailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon