LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cape Wind offers only empty promises so far 

Credit:  April 16, 2013 | www.southcoasttoday.com ~~

“Polluter blockade of New Bedford wind jobs finally failing” (Your View,” April 14), by the communications manager of National Wildlife Federation, advocates for Cape Wind and rails against the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound.

NWF’s conflicted position blesses the killing of up to 6,600 birds per year by Cape Wind as represented by the Massachusetts Audubon Society in testimony to federal regulators. These birds fall under the protection of strict liability criminal statutes and international treaties:

“By utilizing other bird mortality data provided in the DEIS, Mass Audubon staff scientists arrived at avian mortalities that ranged from 2,300 to 6,600 collision deaths per year.”

NWF makes jobs claims on behalf of Cape Wind that are unfounded.

For 22 months, from April 1, 2011, to Dec. 31, 2012, the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Wind Technology Testing Center has created zero jobs, according to the federal government’s Recovery Tracker. The MACEC ratepayer surcharge program is the source of the $13.2 million used to develop the testing center. The center also received a $2 million DOE grant, and funding by U.S. taxpayers through ARRA stimulus of $24.7 million. We have no jobs to show for our $40 million spent.

The conversion of New Bedford, the world’s most famous whaling era seaport and fishing village, with an estimated $100 million in public funding, to a wind turbine port, to create jobs, would result in the loss of actual jobs. As the commercial and recreational fishing industry representatives with whom I’ve interacted at federal hearings on the “wind rush” identify offshore wind turbines as a threat to their safety and existing marine trades, their jobs and the state’s economy. The commercial fishing industry alone supports 149,124 jobs in New England, according to the latest edition of National Atmospheric Administration annual report. Massachusetts employs the largest share of the industry in the region, with 98,358 employees. The landings revenue for New England is $1.1 billion.

Citizens are entitled to energy sources that are reliable and commercially reasonable, but Cape Wind energy would be three times current cost. And, Cape Wind turbines are “discontinued,” “sinking,” “shifting” and “corroding” as specified by the developer in the Construction Operation Plan COP, and in the 4,000-page Environmental Impact Statement.

The Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound defends the interests of ratepayers, wildlife, tribes, and the fishing industry that provides tangible and edible benefits, while generating actual revenue and U.S. jobs. The wind lobby demonstrates more political clout than merit. The promise of free wind, green jobs, by the transfer of our wealth to multinationals, in natural resource and monetary terms, is made by industry for profit. Neither the public nor environmental interests are served when government and non-governmental organizations serve the interests of industry, and then join to pull the wool over eyes.

Barbara Durkin lives in Northboro

Source:  April 16, 2013 | www.southcoasttoday.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky