LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge sides with Xcel, throwing out wind farm dispute with EnXco 

Credit:  Article by: DAVID SHAFFER , Star Tribune | Updated: April 4, 2013 | StarTribune | www.startribune.com ~~

A federal judge has sided with Xcel Energy and vindicated the utility for its 2010 decision to cancel a $400 million wind farm in North Dakota that posed a potential risk to two protected birds.

U.S. District Judge Michael Davis dismissed a lawsuit filed by EnXco, the would-be developer of the Merricourt project, whose wind turbines were seen as a risk to the piping plover and whooping crane. EnXco, a U.S. affiliate of Paris-based EDF Energies Nouvelles, sued Xcel for dropping out of the 100-turbine wind farm, which was never built.

But Davis, ruling in Minneapolis, threw out the case before trial, saying that Xcel had a right to terminate its agreement at a drop-dead date – March 31, 2010 – because EnXco had not yet obtained site permit for the project. That permit later was approved.

EnXco contended that bird-protection issues could have been addressed at the project site near Ellendale, N.D. EnXco said the company already had purchased turbines for the Merricourt project, although Xcel asserted that EnXco deployed them at another wind farm, cutting its losses.

“EnXco is a sophisticated commercial entity that has entered into many projects involving wind projects and other renewable energy,” the judge wrote in an order signed Wednesday and filed electronically on Thursday. “Accordingly, the court can reasonably infer that EnXco is knowledgeable of the varying risks that may arise with respect to such projects.”

Source:  Article by: DAVID SHAFFER , Star Tribune | Updated: April 4, 2013 | StarTribune | www.startribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon