LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

“Lowell Six” argues their case in front of Vermont Supreme Court 

Credit:  By Vanessa Misciagna | WPTZ Burlington | March 27, 2013 | www.wptz.com ~~

At a Vermont Supreme Court hearing at the Vermont Law School, defense attorney Kristina Michelson had a small window of time to convince the justices her clients were not trespassing on Green Mountain Power Land last August, when protesting the Kingdom Community Wind Project.

“I thought it went great, the court was very engaged,” said Michelson, who was happy to be granted the chance to potentially turn her clients’ trespassing convictions around.

“I believe that the justices were fairly convinced that the jury had been confused,” she said.

In 2012, the defendants, dubbed the “Lowell Six,” blockaded GMP’s wind project that was being constructed on the Lowell Mountain ridgeline.

At issue is the question: Who owned the land the protesters were removed from?

GMP says the group was trespassing on their land, while the “Six” protesters say they were on land owned by Don and Shirley Nelson, who gave them permission to be there.

The state maintained that GMP had the land requirements to enforce trespassing laws.

In a statement, Green Mountain Power said:

“A jury of their peers found the protesters were trespassing when they interrupted construction on Lowell Mountain. Police gave them every opportunity to leave, but they chose to be arrested. GMP has a valid lease for that land, confirmed in town records, and we are confident the jury understood the facts.”

If the conviction stands, the defendants could face a $250 fine or 25 hours of community service. There is no word on when the Supreme Court will make a decision.

Source:  By Vanessa Misciagna | WPTZ Burlington | March 27, 2013 | www.wptz.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky