LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Nelsen offers alternative plan for county’s wind energy zoning 

Credit:  March 26, 2013 | www.hamburgreporter.com ~~

Otoe County Commissioner Tim Nelsen said Tuesday he hopes his proposed alternatives for a wind energy policy will generate a conversation on the county board and avoid passage of a policy that discourages the wind power industry.

The county began drafting wind turbine zoning in 2008 when a tower to test wind energy was proposed for a location near roads 18 and P as part of a project called Burr Ridge Wind.

An 11-page policy came before the county board on two occasions. It was last presented in February, but did not come to a vote.

Otoe County Commissioner Tim Nelsen said Tuesday he hopes his proposed alternatives for a wind turbine policy will generate a conversation on the county board and avoid passage of a policy that discourages the wind power industry.

The county began drafting wind turbine zoning in 2008 when a tower to test wind energy was proposed for a location near roads 18 and P as part of a project called Burr Ridge Wind.

An 11-page policy came before the county board on two occasions. It was last presented in February, but did not come to a vote.

Nelsen’s alternatives would impact small windmills and large arrays of windmills linked into an energy system.

For commercial wind farms, Nelsen would amend engineering criteria and eliminate a third-party opinion on the impact on wildlife.

He would not regulate windmill signage or limit shadow flicker to a set number of hours per year.

He would also eliminate the zoning administrator’s duty to receive complaints from neighbors and pass those on to the wind farm operator.

Nelsen proposes striking the following requirements small windmills.

Setback of 50 feet from property line
Duty to notify the public utility company if wind system will generate more than 25 kilowatts
Noise limit of 50 dba at closest neighboring dwelling
Duty of written evidence that utilities notified of connecting to grid
Additional fees for zoning administrator

Nelsen proposes striking the following requirements for commercial wind energy operations.

Duty for site analysis by engineer qualified with wind energy systems. Duty to have a third party opinion about the impact to wildlife and migratory bird flyways.
Duty to have signs at windmills and restricted access to towers.
Setback of 1,300 feet from inhabited dwelling without permission from the occupant of the dwelling.
Duty to position towers so shadow flicker does not exceed 30 hours per year.
Duty of zoning administrator to receive complaints from neighbors and to pass complaints on to the system operator.

Nelsen proposes that all road improvements required by the project would be paid for by the developer. The planning commission version says the county board will decide who will pay for road improvements.

Nelsen said he hopes his alternative policy will encourage county commissioners to question the need for the more restrictive elements of the planning commission’s version.

In February, Nelsen said he does not know of any wind farms built in any of Nebraska’s 10 counties that have adopted policies as restrictive as what the planning commission has proposed.

He said he is concerned that the regulations are so severe they would make it difficult for large wind farms to operate and would cause them to stay away.

Nelsen said wind energy and the wind industry need to be encouraged in Otoe County. “It’s another tool for economic development,” he said.

He said his plan preserve the land owners’ freedom to develop their own land, is friendlier to wind energy companies and is much simpler.

He said he hopes commissioners will consider why the more restrictive regulations of the planning commission version should be adopted.

Source:  March 26, 2013 | www.hamburgreporter.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky