LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Effort to push back renewable energy requirements fails in House committee 

Credit:  By BRENT D. WISTROM, Eagle Topeka bureau | The Wichita Eagle | March 19, 2013 | www.kansas.com ~~

TOPEKA – Attempts to tweak a bill to push back requirements for how much energy in Kansas must come from renewable sources, such as wind turbines, failed during a closely-watched debate Tuesday.

With a standing-room-only crowd packed into a room in the Capitol, the House Energy and Environment Committee narrowly voted to table the bill, likely killing it for the year.

The bill had previously been approved by the committee, only to be kicked back to the committee by the full House. But Republican leaders kept the proposal alive in hopes of a compromise that could gain traction.

Rep. Dennis Hedke, a geophysicist from Wichita who has several energy companies as clients, said the pushback against renewable energy standards is about 2.9 million Kansans who are seeing higher energy rates that he says, and critics dispute, are driven largely by government mandates to use alternative energy sources.

“Right now we have way too much power capacity to deliver through transmission lines,” he said. “Forcing additional activity by the mandates is not going to help that situation.”

Hedke said electrical rates have increased 37 percent since 2008, in part due to mandates from the state and federal government.

Council Grove Republican Rep. Tom Moxley said the state made a deal that has led to hundreds of millions of dollars being invested in Kansas, and he disputed Hedke’s assertion that rates have increased by 37 percent because of wind energy.

Kansas Corporation Commission data shows it’s far less than that, Moxley said.

“Less than 2 percent is what we’re fighting over,” he said.

In 2009, the state passed a law requiring energy companies to generate or buy electricity from renewable sources, such as wind turbines. Companies must show they get a specific percent of power from such sources during peak demand times.

Kansas is among about 40 states with renewable energy standards. About a dozen other states are working to roll such standards back.

House Bill 2241 would give the companies more time to hit the 10 percent and 15 percent standards and it would have eliminated a 20 percent standard. The 15 percent standard is set for 2015, but the bill would have moved it to 2017. The 15 percent standard for 2016 to 2019 would have been moved to 2018.

Rep. Scott Schwab, R-Olathe, said the debate over renewable standards has gotten ridiculous.

He said that it’s about whether to mandate alternative energy or not. He pressed for an amendment to get rid of the mandates until a new coal-fired power plant is built in Holcomb, an issue currently held up by the Supreme Court.

It failed.

Rep. Julie Menghini, D-Pittsburg, said it’s not just about deals made

related to the Holcomb power plant.

“It’s not about a deal that a bunch of suits made one evening,” she said. “It’s about jobs. It’s about economic vitality. It’s about the future health of Kansas citizens. It’s about the future environmental health of our state. To bring it down to ‘it’s about a deal’ is almost offensive to me. This is so much bigger than that. This is about generations of Kansans to come.”

Source:  By BRENT D. WISTROM, Eagle Topeka bureau | The Wichita Eagle | March 19, 2013 | www.kansas.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky