LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Goodhue wind turbine project tabled by Public Utilities Commission 

Credit:  by Stephanie Hemphill, Minnesota Public Radio | February 28, 2013 | minnesota.publicradio.org ~~

A controversial wind power project in southeastern Minnesota has been delayed.

Several developments have happened at Goodhue Wind since it was proposed four years ago. It’s now called New Era Wind Farm, it has changed owners, some of the original participants have dropped out, the company is in a dispute with power purchaser Xcel Energy and the state rejected its bird and bat protection plan.

All that made for too much uncertainty for the Public Utilities Commission, which has tabled the matter.

A disappointed developer Peter Mastic said, “While New Era would have preferred an affirmative vote on our avian and bat protection plan, we appreciate the time and careful deliberation that the commission and staff made.”

PUC members said they wanted more information about the plan to install 50 turbines in Goodhue County before they could allow it to go forward. The PUC also said the company had failed to fully answer questions about its plan to protect birds and bats. Mastic said he would study the PUC’s request.

The decision also disappointed the project’s critics who wanted the agency to kill it outright by letting its outdated certificate of need lapse.

Critic Marie McNamara with the group Goodhue Wind Truth said it is appropriate for the PUC to be skeptical.

“From the very beginning there’s been misrepresentations on the part of the applicant, where homes were left off maps continuously, we filed and refiled maps,” McNamara said.

Source:  by Stephanie Hemphill, Minnesota Public Radio | February 28, 2013 | minnesota.publicradio.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky