| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Offshore wind bill breezes past GOP amendments
Credit: by Holly Nunn Staff writer | Feb. 20, 2013 | www.somdnews.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
After eight proposed amendments and nearly an hour of debate Wednesday, the House advanced Gov. Martin O’Malley’s proposal to subsidize an offshore wind farm without making changes.
The amendments, all introduced by Republicans, called for a range of actions – from requiring turbine components be made in the U.S. to excluding Western Maryland counties from rate hikes spelled out in the bill.
“The [wind power] projects we have in Western Maryland people in the rest of the state are not paying for,” said Del. Wendell R. Beitzel (R-Dist. 1A) of Accident, in support of an amendment proposed by Del. Leroy E. Myers Jr. (R-Dist. 1C) of Clear Spring that would have excluded power customers in Carroll, Frederick, Washington, Allegany and Garrett counties from the rate hikes outlined in the bill. The amendment failed 89-44.
O’Malley’s bill creates a process for the Public Service Commission to approve an offshore wind developer to build a 200-megawatt wind farm in a designated area off the coast of Ocean City. One requirement for any developer’s proposal is that the estimated monthly bill for the average Maryland residential customer cannot increase more than $1.50. Major commercial power consumers cannot be charged more than 1.5 percent of their monthly bill.
Another amendment, proposed by Del. Andrew A. Serafini (R-Dist. 2A) of Hagerstown, would have capped the amount of usage on which a commercial customer would have to pay extra at 60,000 kwh. Serafini said that industrial and commercial customers likely will have to pass the rate hike on to consumers in the form of higher prices for products.
Serafini’s proposal “would effectively kill the project,” said Del. Dereck E. Davis (D-Dist. 25) of Upper Marlboro, chair of the House Economic Matters Committee. The amendment failed 90-45.
Wind power will be much more expensive to produce than traditional forms of energy, such as fossil fuels, because a new infrastructure will have to be developed. The tab for customers is designed to offset the cost of infrastructure construction, but will only be applied to monthly bills when the turbines are up and running, which won’t happen until 2017 at the earliest, O’Malley administration officials said.
The governor has taken the wind bill to the General Assembly for three years running. Although it got held up in Senate committee last year, the measure passed in the House, so Wednesday’s advance by voice vote was not unexpected.
The Senate Finance committee has not yet voted on the bill, but six of the committee’s 11 members are co-sponsors, so the legislation is expected to get a favorable report.
The House is expected to vote on the bill Friday.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=33655 ]
