LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Webster considers wind power 

Webster Town Supervisor Ron Nesbitt says the town could potentially reap big savings by installing a wind turbine at the Phillips Road water treatment plant. A test tower went up in December to determine if the conditions at the plant are right for wind energy. Right now, it costs the town about $200,000 a year to power that facility using electricity.

“What we’ve been told is that we could save 30 to 40 percent of that bill by installing a windmill,” said Nesbitt.

At a nearby farm powered almost entirely by wind energy, Bob Bechtold is thrilled. Bechtold’s long been a proponent of using wind energy as an alternative power source. He also harnesses the wind at his company, Harbec Plastics, on Route 104 in Wayne County.

“I like the phrase I heard recently; if not wind, what?” said Bechtold.

John Boettcher, president of the Rochester Birding Association, has some doubts. Too often, he says, wind turbines pose a threat to flocks of migrating birds.

“I don’t think anyone’s against wind energy, we just need to be smart about where we put these turbines,” said Boettcher.

There are conflicting studies on the danger to birds from wind towers. A Danish study released last month suggests the threat to birds is very minimal. Boettcher concedes there is data to argue the issue either way.

Nesbitt says Webster is moving slowly in this process and is planning public hearings on whether to install a wind tower at the Phillips Road water treatment plant next fall.

By Pat McGonigle

whec.com

5 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon