LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lee County residents say no to wind farm 

Credit:  By David Giuliani - Shaw Media Service | Created: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 | www.bcrnews.com ~~

DIXON – Mainstream Renewable Power wants to put up turbines in southwestern Lee County, but neighbors urge Lee County officials to reject the company’s proposal.

On Monday, the county’s zoning board of appeals held its 25th hearing for the planned 53 turbines. Residents made their closing statements.

Pat Scully, who would live near the turbines, said no one has the right to reduce his home value.

“My house won’t be worth anything with a wind farm next to it,” he said. “There are a lot of people who don’t want (the wind turbines) to be our neighbors. If they want to come to our neighborhood, they should buy our neighborhood.”

Another resident, Robin Ackerson, also objected to the wind farm. She noted Mainstream’s project map indicated her property was Recipient 37.

“Recipient of what?” she asked. “They’re not putting any turbines on our property, so I’m not receiving any money. Not that I want turbines. I will receive shadow flicker, noise and destruction of property value.”

Eight turbines, Ackerson said, would be within one mile of her property, closer to her home than those of the landowners who would allow them.

“I feel this is an intrusion. The noise is an intrusion,” Ackerson said. “You can hear leaves falling from my house. That’s why I live out there. If I have eight turbines near my home, the quiet I experience on a day-to-day basis will forever be destroyed.”

She likes to ride horses on her pasture, but she fears the shadow flicker from the turbines will scare the animals.

“There’s nothing more dangerous than a frightened horse,” Ackerson said.

For most of the two and one-half hour hearing, Bob Logan, Franklin Grove’s village president, had the floor. He criticized Lee County’s wind farm regulations as weak, saying the county had a history of letting the wind energy industry write the rules.

In 2006, he said, a company wrote the findings of fact for the zoning board before the panel approved the firm’s wind farm.

“The person who does the work wins the game,” he said.

Logan also questioned whether Mainstream would even operate the proposed turbines. The company hasn’t ruled out selling the wind farm, as it has done with others, including the Shady Oaks project, near Lee County’s Compton.

Logan referred to Mainstream’s many promises during the hearings, which he said meant little if the company sold the project to another firm.

“I have a problem when you do something of this magnitude when no one is really accountable,” he said.

More closing statements were scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday nights. The hearings began in July, but it’s unclear when the county will complete the process.

The zoning board will make a recommendation on the wind farm to the county board, which has the final say.

Last summer, the Whiteside County Board approved nine turbines for the project, which includes three counties. Mainstream pulled its proposal for 19 turbines in Bureau County after the county’s zoning panel rejected it. The company plans to submit a new plan.

For agendas of meetings, minutes and transcripts from past meetings, or more information, go to www.leecountyil.com or call 815-288-5676.

Source:  By David Giuliani - Shaw Media Service | Created: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 | www.bcrnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon