LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Government invests £50m in windfarms 

Credit:  Terry Macalister | The Guardian | 6 February 2013 | www.guardian.co.uk ~~

The government is buying a multi-million pound equity stake in a series of onshore windfarms in an unusual move that is likely to anger Conservative backbench MPs campaigning against public subsidies for one of the most controversial forms of renewable energy.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) is spending £50m on six windfarms – five onshore and one offshore – through a “cornerstone” stake in a renewable energy fund called Greencoat UK Wind, launched on Wednesday. Some of the farms are being bought outright, while others involve a stake of less than 50% being purchased from two of the big six energy companies, RWE and SSE.

Among the windfarms to benefit will be Little Cheyne Court at Romney Marsh in Kent, which faced serious opposition from parish, district and county councils when it was first built by RWE.

Also getting financial help are the Carcant windfarm in the Scottish Borders, the Bin Mountain facility in Tyrone, Northern Ireland, and the Rhyl Flats offshore farm off north Wales. The government needs more than £100bn to be invested in wind and other green power sources by 2020 if it is to get near its targets for reducing carbon emissions.

BIS justified the investments by saying a move to lower-carbon power sources needed government to act as a “catalyst”, in a bid to suck in the major institutional and private investors.

“The transition towards a green economy requires unprecedented levels of investment,” said a BIS spokesperson. “By investing in the Greencoat UK Wind fund, the government is taking action to help catalyse the additional private sector capital required to achieve the necessary increase in investment.”But the move will be controversial because 100 Conservative MPs have already written to David Cameron arguing that subsidy levels through the renewable obligation were already too high and should be reduced.

Some of those MPs believe that onshore windfarms are not only an overly-expensive way of generating power but should not have been built because they are intrusive to homeowners and a blot on the landscape.

Greencoat UK Wind is an infrastructure fund that has just announced plans to float on the London Stock Exchange. It is seeking to raise £205m and has already been backed by BIS (£50m) and SSE (£43m) itself.

Tim Ingram, the non-executive chairman of Greencoat, said operational windfarms should make attractive investments, particularly for investors seeking long-term, predictable returns. “Greencoat UK Wind represents the first opportunity to invest into a listed infrastructure fund fully invested in operating UK windfarms.” The fund promises to pay a 6p per share dividend that will increase along with inflation.

Earlier this week Centrica dropped out of a bid to build new nuclear plants in Britain. This underlined the financial pressures on the big six and showed the problems for ministers trying to win low-carbon investment.

Meanwhile the difficulties for the wind sector were emphasised when Vestas, the world’s biggest manufacturer of turbines, scaled back its global sales targets for 2013, from 5 gigawatts (GW) to 4GW.

The Danish company, which dropped plans to build a new plant at Sheerness in Kent last summer, is already in the middle of a huge restructuring which involves shedding 5,000 jobs worldwide.

Source:  Terry Macalister | The Guardian | 6 February 2013 | www.guardian.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky