LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" ā€¢ results by date ]

[ Google-powered ā€¢ results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind concerns inform future planning policy 

Credit:  Northumberland Gazette | 1 February 2013 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk ~~

Campaigners have cautiously welcomed proposals for a minimum distance between wind turbines and homes, but claim more is needed.

As reported in last weekā€™s Gazette, the county councilā€™s proposed policy on large-scale wind developments would include a ā€˜presumption against development within a distance of six times the turbine blade tip unless it can be demonstrated that the presence of turbines would not have an unacceptable impact upon living conditionsā€™.

Several recent proposals in north Northumberland have included turbines of around 100-125metres to blade tip, which would mean a distance from homes of 600-750metres.

Coun Glen Sanderson, who has twice put motions before the council calling for similar restrictions, said: ā€œI very much welcome the fact that the county council has listened to people out there who have expressed their concerns very clearly. The response to the original document showed that people are very determined to make sure that the council toughens up its planning policies.ā€

But last week, Dr James Lunn, who campaigned against the Fenrother windfarm, said: ā€œI think it is an excellent first step, but nothing more than that. I personally feel the separation distance should be greater and the council should offer its residents more protection.ā€

Source:  Northumberland Gazette | 1 February 2013 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe ā€œfair useā€ as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar ā€œfair dealingā€ provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky