LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Let the voters decide 

Credit:  Falmouth Enterprise | January 25, 2013 | ~~

After all the pubic airing, the Town Meeting discussions, the extensive meetings of the turbine options group, and the letters to the editor, one might have wondered what the selectmen could learn from yet another public comment session on Wednesday night. But it was, in a way, revealing. There can be no doubt now that there is strong public support for taking the town’s two turbines down. There is also, clearly, concern about the cost of doing so.

The selectmen have a clear path, however, and that is to put the question to voters in the way of a debt exclusion that will be necessary in order to pay the costs of taking the machines down. If the board feels uncomfortable taking that initiative on their own, they could wait until April Town Meeting.

Kathryn Elder has filed a petitioners article asking Town Meeting to advise the selectmen to put the question to voters. But they might as well act soon and get it done with. It is easy to look back, but such a request to voters probably should have been decided upon months ago when it was clear that the turbine options group was coming to loggerheads and would never reach a consensus on one solution.

Ultimately, it will be best to put it to voters who, in the privacy of the voting booth, can register their opinion on the matter without fear of judgment from others on either side of the issue.

Mistakes were made, to be sure, but it was good intentions that led us to where we are today. Nonetheless, some have and will continue to issue blame. That is unfortunate. It would be best to solve the problem and move forward, with hope, in a healed community. The best chance of getting there will be if there is a vote. We are quite sure the result will be to fund the removal of the turbines. But either way, it will be best to allow the community to decide as a whole and accept the consequences as a whole.

Source:  Falmouth Enterprise | January 25, 2013 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky