LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Power line support sought in D.C. 

The developer of a $1.6 billion high-voltage power line is in Washington today and is to talk with Sens. Charles Schumer and Hillary Rodham Clinton about how his project would be a boon for wind farms and other renewable-energy resources in Upstate New York.

But local officials and opponents of the project say New York Regional Interconnect’s pitch isn’t connecting. They say the company’s claim that opening up the state electric grid by constructing a 190-mile-long transmission line would make green energy more viable is misleading.

Bill May, project manager for the Albany-based NYRI, said he has spoken to would-be wind farm developers who could benefit from construction of the transmission line from Marcy to the lower Hudson Valley through Madison and Oneida counties.

“Their single biggest business problem is being able to deliver to market,” May said in an interview Wednesday.

“The same wind that brings us lake-effect snow also brings a lot of renewable energy,” May continued. “Unfortunately, the areas where there are a lot of opportunities for renewable resources are never in congested urban areas. Transmission is the only resource that connects large renewable resources and urban areas.”

Opponents say transmission isn’t the only factor in the renewable-energy equation. The viability of a wind farm is determined by the availability of wind, the cost of hooking into the existing transmission system,

and state and local subsidies, said Madison County Assistant Planning Director Paul Miller, who has been working with the municipal coalition Communities Against Regional Interconnect.

Miller says wind farms wouldn’t be able to hook into NYRI’s line because its direct current transmission is incompatible with the rest of the electricity running through the state’s grid and needs to be converted at pricey substations.

“Those substations cost hundreds of millions of dollars,” Miller said. “No wind farm could participate in that. . . . Like much of what NYRI says about their project, recent statements are mostly wind.”

May, of NYRI, said the transmission line isn’t meant as an access point; instead, it would act as an “express highway” to transfer excess Upstate electricity to Downstate consumers. Building the line and adding it to the grid would be enough to increase the state’s overall capacity and improve the marketplace for renewable-energy developers, May said.

“It will provide a road to market and an incentive to continue to develop larger new projects,” he said.

Bill Moore, who developed the Fenner Wind Farm and is managing the 187-turbine project going up on the Tug Hill Plateau, said the wind industry isn’t currently in need of any more capacity. A state study showed 3,000 megawatts of new wind power can be connected to the state’s grid without any upgrade, Moore said. About 375 megawatts are currently operating statewide, he said, with many more in development.

“I don’t think it’s necessary to bring the question of wind feasibility into this matter,” Moore said. “They are two different topics.”

Moore did say that transmission deficiencies in the state grid would need to be addressed at some point.

“New wind can survive on its own with the existing system,” Moore said. “But we would all be better off with an expanded transmission system.”

By Alaina Potrikus
Staff writer

syracuse.com

1 March 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon