LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Council in a spin over turbine plan 

Campaigners opposed to a planned windfarm on the outskirts of an attractive Eden town have claimed an early victory, reports Paul Duncan.

Eden District Council’s planning committee voted 13-0 to refuse permission for a controversial scheme to build three wind turbines on land at Hoff Moor, south of Appleby.

As the councillors’ decision went against the recommendation of council officers to approve the scheme, the planning committee will discuss the application again at a meeting in April when it will either agree to endorse its original decision or it could decide to approve the windfarm.

Despite this, anti-windfarm protesters are claiming victory in “round one” of the fight.

Geoff Lightburn attended the meeting as a representative of the Hoff Ward of Bandleyside Parish Council and said he was pleased to see “local democracy working”.

The plans had caused widespread unrest in the community and during the consultation process the majority of local parish councils were opposed to it due to the “detrimental effect” it would have on the landscape and tourism in the area.

The application was lodged by farming family H.P. Bainbridge who said the windfarm – which if built, would have been 95 metres high and able to generate enough electricity to supply up to 2,340 homes – was part of plans to diversify and would guarantee the farm’s survival for the next 25 years.

When contacted by The Messenger, a representative of the applicant declined to comment.

By Paul Duncan

thisisthelakedistrict.co.uk

21 February 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky