LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Gamesa gaffe puts wind up ministers 

Credit:  The Courier | 28 December 2012 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Blundering government ministers yesterday issued a report boasting about a £43 million investment that would create 300 jobs in Dundee – more than a year after those plans were abandoned.

The embarrassing gaffe was contained in the UK Government’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) – which was also seen and approved by Scottish Government energy minister Fergus Ewing.

His photograph and signature, alongside that of UK energy minister Ed Davey, was included on the ministerial foreword to the report.

Wind turbine manufacturer Gamesa had considered investing in Dundee but announced on December 2 2011 that it no longer considered the city suitable.

Four months later it confirmed its factory would be built at Leith instead.

Even more humiliatingly for both the energy ministers, the investment in Leith is discussed in the paragraph immediately preceding the one containing the erroneous information about Dundee.

The information about Dundee in the UK Renewable Energy Roadmap, published yesterday, was taken from a Scottish Government press release from January last year.

And, in another confusing twist, yesterday’s report is an update to a publication about renewable energy dating from July 2011 which had no mention of Gamesa, even though the company was intending to invest in Dundee at that time.

Their plans for Dundee were first announced by First Minister Alex Salmond but were dropped last year because Gamesa claimed there was not enough space at the port.

At the time, a Scottish Government spokesman said they remained optimistic there would be other significant investment in the renewable energy industry in Dundee.

But Labour councillor Richard McCready said he fears the city could lose out on further investment.

“It was quite clear when Gamesa decided to go to Leith, there would be no Gamesa spin-off for our city,” he said.

“This was followed by a memorandum of understanding signed by Scottish and Southern Energy and the city council to bring renewable investment to Dundee and we are still waiting.

“Whether the information contained within this report was an error or not, the message is clear – when looking at renewable energy investment, the city council and the Scottish Government needs to act and act fast.

“We have a workforce ready to work and we have been promised jobs for some time. I urge the SNP to make good on their promises and deliver much-needed jobs for our city.”

A DECC spokeswoman said the error in yesterday’s report was “regrettable” but that she was confident Scotland will still benefit from investment in renewable energy.

She said: “There is regrettably some text which should not be in the UK Renewable Energy Roadmap update regarding Gamesa’s plans for offshore wind technology in Dundee.

“However, this shouldn’t detract from a key message in the document, that Scotland is a powerhouse for renewables in the UK.”

A Scottish Government spokeswoman did not address why Mr Ewing had signed off on a report containing such a glaring error.

She said: “Scottish Ministers are keen that Scotland maximises the opportunities that are likely to arise from the manufacture and deployment activities relating to offshore renewables and Dundee is ideally-placed to become a key hub for the 
rapidly growing multi-billion pound offshore renewables industry.”

Source:  The Courier | 28 December 2012 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon