LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windfarm opponents angry at loss of birds of prey 

Credit:  Campaigner fears true bird death numbers far greater | The Courier | 22 December 2012 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Campaigners have hit out following the news that two rare birds of prey died after striking wind turbines.

RSPB Scotland revealed that an adult hen harrier had been found dead at the 68-turbine Griffin windfarm in Highland Perthshire earlier this year.

A second raptor was discovered with a broken wing three weeks later and sadly died from its injuries.

Investigations suggest that both birds were fatally injured as a result of mid-air collisions with the turbine blades.

A spokesman for the organisation said the deaths were “tragic” and would have an impact on the local breeding success of an already vulnerable species which is 
“teetering on the brink of extinction”.

However, he did add that windfarm collisions were “very rare” events.

This has failed to placate poet and anti-windfarm campaigner John Burnside, who believes the full extent of the issue goes unrecorded.

He told The Courier: “I am saddened by these incidents but they do not reflect the whole story. I believe the amount of birds killed or injured is actually greater than we are told.

“When they strike a turbine, they don’t necessarily fall at the point of contact. Many fly off elsewhere to either recover or die.

“Many people believe that birds can see the turbines to avoid them but they don’t appreciate that raptors hunt with their eyes on the ground.

“They don’t see where they are going and so can quite easily fly into the blades.”

Mr Burnside, from Arncroach in Fife, called for the RSPB to start putting more pressure on windfarm developments to prevent this type of incident from happening again and threatening the future of rare breeds such as the hen harrier and sea eagle, which was recently reintroduced to Fife.

Head of planning and development at RSPB Scotland Aedán Smith revealed that it has been working closely with SSE, operators of the Griffin windfarm, to avoid any more deaths.

This has included visiting the site near Aberfeldy and issuing advice to increase post-construction monitoring in a bid to understand how birds use the site, particularly during their display periods.

Mr Smith said: “It is important to remember that climate change still poses one of the biggest threats to birds and other wildlife. Thus, appropriately-sited windfarms remain part of a wider range of measures to mitigate this impact.

“Nonetheless, this new information will be used to help evaluate future windfarm proposals. Lessons must be learned.

“This case also highlights the importance of continued monitoring before, during and after a development, so we can ensure such projects can exist without detrimentally affecting our wildlife.”

A spokesman for SSE confirmed that on April 18 engineers discovered a dead harrier lying below a turbine and on May 9 a second one was found injured nearby.

“SSE staff immediately took the bird to a local vet for assessment and treatment and notified the RSPB and SNH (Scottish Natural Heritage),” he said.

“Unfortunately, the bird died two days later in the care of a raptor expert.

“These incidents are very rare and the two hen harrier deaths are the first recorded on any of SSE’s windfarms.”

Source:  Campaigner fears true bird death numbers far greater | The Courier | 22 December 2012 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon