LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm developer stops Northumberland campaigners’ blimp protest 

Credit:  by Brian Daniel, The Journal | Dec 1 2012 | www.journallive.co.uk ~~

A wind farm developer has stopped Northumberland campaigners fighting its turbine plans from flying a blimp in protest.

Energiekontor UK Ltd has rejected the request from residents at Belford, who wanted to illustrate the 100m height of its nine proposed engines.

After the refusal, villagers roped in their MP Sir Alan Beith, who has written to the company asking it to allow a blimp to be flown.

The campaigners – The Middleton Burn Action Group – are waiting to find out whether they will be given permission to fly another at the site of a further 16 125m turbines close to the village.

The action group was originally set up to oppose plans from Air Farmers Ltd, now Middleton Burn Ltd, for those 16 turbines, but it broadened its remit when the Energiekontor scheme for a wind farms at Belford Burn emerged.

Neither company has submitted a planning application to date.

The group wrote to landowners involved in both projects and asked their permission to be allowed to fly blimps at the sites.

It is keen to employ such a tactic both now, and ahead of the planning applications being lodged, and in future should councillors hold site visits.

In the case of the Energiekontor scheme, the landowner said it would be a decision for the company, and when the group asked the developer it was told permission would not be given.

The group contacted Berwick MP Sir Alan Beith, who agreed to write to the company requesting it reconsider. The MP has yet to receive a response.

Group vice chairman Kerry Noble, who lives in Belford, last night said: “We all know why they do not want to fly a blimp.

“It is painfully obvious, they always play down the height of these things and when you put a blimp up it gives residents the opportunity to actually see how tall these things are going to be towering above this village.”

Energiekontor failed to respond to The Journal’s request for a comment.

In the case of the Middleton Burn project, the group received a reply from landowner Alastair Nixon of Swinhoe Farm, to which it sent a response, but has to still to receive an answer to its request.

Mr Nixon last night told The Journal he was not in a position to grant or decline the group’s request, and that he had passed it to Air Farmers which would be contacting campaigners shortly.

Mr Noble meanwhile revealed the group is considering other ways of demonstrating the height of the proposed turbines.

He said members may employ microlights to release smoke bombs from, or helicopters to hover at, the relevant heights.

Mr Noble said: “I can not think of a more improper site for an industrial wind farm than slap bang in the middle of the Kyloe Hills Area of High Landscape Value, which will be seen from Holy Island to Berwick, they will be seen from every position from the Cheviots to the national park.

“It is just absolutely unbelievably wrong, it is far too close to habitation.”

Source:  by Brian Daniel, The Journal | Dec 1 2012 | www.journallive.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky