LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Call for turbine moratorium gets louder 

Credit:  By Bob Boughner, Chatham Daily News | November 14, 2012 | www.chathamdailynews.ca ~~

MITCHELL’S BAY – A renewed call for an immediate moratorium on industrial wind turbine construction will be made Thursday by two area politicians.

Lambton-Kent-Middlesex MP Bev Shipley and MPP Monte McNaughton have scheduled a 9:30 a.m. media conference on Bear Line.

The media event will take place at the home of former federal Liberal MP Rex Crawford.

A spokesperson for McNaughton said the two elected officials want all turbine construction to halt until results of a federal health study on the impacts of turbines has been tabled.

That study, announced earlier this fall, is expected to take two years to complete.

The spokesman said there is also growing concern about the devaluation of property as a result of the rapid proliferation of wind turbines in Chatham-Kent and throughout southwestern Ontario.

A group of residents in the former Dover Township have filed a $9 million lawsuit against International Power Canada Inc. and East Lake St. Clair Wind Inc. over the installation of 55 wind turbines along the Lake St. Clair shoreline from Wallaceburg to the Thames River.

The resident’s Toronto-based lawyer Eric Gillespie is also representing LaSalle homeowners who recently filed a $10 million claim against River Canard Energy Inc and Pajot Farms Inc., based on two industrial wind turbines off Disputed Road.

Gillespie has said the claim is based on a “substantial reduction in property value caused by, among other causes, non-natural use of neighbouring properties as well as visual and acoustic trespass.”

The claims have not been proven in court.

Source:  By Bob Boughner, Chatham Daily News | November 14, 2012 | www.chathamdailynews.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon