LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Boone leaders disagree on wind energy comments 

Credit:  Jennifer Wheeler | www.rrstar.com ~~

Boone County leaders were at odds Tuesday over the type of comments heard on wind energy.

The purpose of Tuesday’s Zoning Board of Appeals meeting was to hear testimony about whether to double to 2,000 feet the distance between “primary” structures and wind devices; expand the list of primary structures; and create a fund to cover the cost of eventually taking the wind turbines out of service once their parts fail. The county’s Planning, Zoning and Building Committee proposed these suggestions months ago.

However, topics surrounding shadow flicker, property values, alpaca farms and Mainstream Renewable Power’s intentions were brought up by residents. Many attendees argued those issues factored into the setback distance.

ZBA Chairman Norm Stimes repeatedly asked residents to focus on the text amendment at hand. Issues surrounding specific projects are addressed in special use permits; zoning code amendments address general requirements of all wind power projects.

“What I’m hearing is emotional reaction without a straightforward, calm presentation of a proposal,” said Darrel Davis, who a member of the ZBA. “It is ridiculous. I would just (like them to know) how it hurts their cause to perform like this.”

However, ZBA member Joan Krumm said all testimony must be heard, no matter how long it takes. She said she intends to base her vote only on information presented during these meetings.

“There are quite a few people, who part of the staff and this committee, who do not want to hear all of this. I don’t care how many other meetings they have been to. It matters what I’m hearing from the public and the public forum,” she added.

Source:  Jennifer Wheeler | www.rrstar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon