LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Kenly Landscape Protection Group accuses university of trying to ‘pressure’ council on windfarm plan 

Credit:  By Michael Alexander | The Courier | www.thecourier.co.uk 25 September 2012 ~~

Campaigners fighting St Andrews University’s windfarm plans say they are ”puzzled and concerned” the university has not lodged an appeal with the Scottish Government – despite announcing two weeks ago it was doing so.

The university – which believes it will have a better chance of a fair hearing by going to the Scottish Government – wants to generate its own energy through windpower by building six 330ft turbines at Kenly Farm near Boarhills.

However, in a report to Wednesday’s Fife Council North East Fife Area Committee, the application is being recommended for refusal by Fife Council planners.

Planners say the proposed development would have a detrimental impact on the landscape and a detrimental cumulative impact alongside a separate proposed windfarm by another applicant at Lingo.

Members of the Kenly Landscape Protection Group (KLPG) welcomed Fife Council’s recommendation but they questioned the tactics of the university, after it emerged the Scottish Government’s Department of Planning and Environment Appeals said it did not yet have a record of a university appeal being lodged.

A KLPG spokesman said: ”This may be a tactic to put pressure on Fife Council to ensure the proposal was brought forward to committee this month with a recommendation of approval.

”However, the officer’s recommendation on very strong grounds is for refusal and it would be perverse if councillors went against the recommendation in this instance.

”The application should be refused. This raises the prospect the university may still lodge an appeal before Wednesday.

”In that case, the committee would not determine the application but will be asked for a view to be given to the Scottish minister, which should be a deemed refusal in line with the recommendation.”

KLPG described the Fife Council planner’s report as a ”careful and thorough assessment of the impacts of the proposal against national and local policy”.

”It sets a benchmark for assessing future windfarm applications in Fife,” the group added.

KLPG has issued a final plea to councillors to refuse the university’s windfarm for the sake of the St Andrews community. It came as members of the North East Fife Area Committee were due to make a site visit.

The KLPG spokesman added: ”We are afraid that if the university windfarm is permitted, it will open the floodgates. Already there are 23 more applications for wind turbines in the East Neuk.

”Because of the height of the turbines (up to 323 feet /100m) and because they stand on elevated ground, they will dominate the skyline for miles around.

”Add in the hundreds of turbines planned for offshore and St Andrews will no longer be the home of golf but the home of turbines. How will that affect tourism which is the area’s lifeblood?

”While we estimate the university stands to make £96 million from the windfarm during its 25-year lifetime, what’s in it for Fifers? We get an industrialised landscape which fewer people will want to visit or live in.

”It would be a very brave politician indeed who votes in favour of this development.”

A spokeswoman for St Andrews University said: ”In terms of our appeal, nothing has changed. We are appealing on the grounds previously indicated and notified to Fife Council.”

Source:  By Michael Alexander | The Courier | www.thecourier.co.uk 25 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon