LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ross wind farm plans slammed as ‘breathtakingly dreadful’ 

Credit:  by Hector Mackenzie | Ross-shire Journal | www.ross-shirejournal.co.uk 8 September 2012 ~~

A wind farm developer is facing an uphill struggle over a proposed 17-turbine scheme near an iconic Ross-shire peak.

In a double whammy for the scheme, the Government’s nature and landscape advisor, Scottish Natural Heritage, came out against the Clach Liath proposal, which was then described as “breathtakingly dreadful” by the boss of the Mountaineering Council of Scotland.

And in an exclusive Ross-shire Journal italicsonline poll, which is still running, in excess of 90 per cent of respondents believe Munros and Corbetts should be protected from wind farm developments.

SNH is concerned the scheme, being worked up by Coriolis Energy, a development partner of Falck Renewables, would adversely affect views of Ben Wyvis.

SNH was responding to the Highland Council’s consultation on a planning application for the 17-turbine development to the east of Meall na Speireig near Evanton.

It warns access tracks for the wind farm could affect an area designated for broad-leaf semi-natural woodland at Allt nan Caorach.

Steve North, SNH operations manager, said: “We have been speaking to the developer about this proposal for the past 18 months and provided pre-application advice, as well as advice on what the environmental impact assessment would need to cover.

“Our advice is that there would be quite serious adverse impacts on views of Ben Wyvis. The mountain is a dominant landmark feature of Easter Ross and the Inner Moray Firth, visible over an extensive area to a significant number of people who are living, working or visiting the area.

“The impact would be particularly noticeable along the Inner Moray Firth tourist route, where the views of Ben Wyvis from the A862 would be affected. There are also existing wind farms on either side of the proposed development, which raises issues about cumulative impacts. On balance we don’t think these impacts could be reasonably addressed.”

David Gibson, chief officer of the Mountaineering Council of Scotland, renewed appeals for an overview of Scottish Government spatial policy on development to ensure wild mountain landscapes are not “industrialised”. In a letter published in today’s Ross-shire Journal he praises SNH for its stance over what he describes as a “breathtakingly dreadful” application.

While he says it is “alarming” such an “environmentally unfriendly” proposal should be put forward, he warns that “the gamble may still pay off” because Scotland lacks a policy stopping developers lodging plans that would “industrialise the best of our remaining wild mountain landscapes”.

Harry Malyon from Coriolis Energy said: “We are naturally disappointed in the initial response from SNH but look forward to sitting down with the agency to discuss their position.

“The site has been specifically chosen to avoid any specially designated areas which protect wildlife or landscape and does not lie on Ben Wyvis. The surrounding area is a thriving energy hub and already has significant development with the industrial estates at Evanton, the pylon line and the boats and rigs on the Firth to the east.

“The wind farm itself would be well screened from most directions and has been planned to sit well in the landscape when viewed from the south.”

Source:  by Hector Mackenzie | Ross-shire Journal | www.ross-shirejournal.co.uk 8 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky