LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Vermont official: Errors in Progressive Party count 

Credit:  DAVE GRAM, Associated Press | www.greenwichtime.com 5 September 2012 ~~

Vermont Secretary of State Jim Condos said Wednesday errors were made in the counting of write-in votes in the Progressive Party gubernatorial primary and the new results mean the challenger can ask for a recount.

Annette Smith, who had not campaigned before the primary but was backed by a group of activists critical of Gov. Peter Shumlin’s environmental policies, said she would ask for a recount if results to be made final Thursday show her losing by a narrow margin.

Wednesday’s news added a new round of drama to a primary voting process that already had seen the reported Progressive nominee, Martha Abbott, withdraw from the race for governor after being declared the winner of the primary. Abbott said she wanted to throw her party’s support to Shumlin, a Democrat who shares the Progressives’ positions calling for single-payer health care and the closing of the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant.

Calais-based lawyer Stephanie Kaplan had led an effort to draft Smith, the Danby-based executive director of the group Vermonters for a Clean Environment, into the Progressive gubernatorial primary. Kaplan and her allies had said they wanted Smith to bring their issues – including strong opposition to mountaintop wind power development – into gubernatorial debates during the general election campaign.

Smith had said before the primary that she was not actively campaigning, because she was too busy working on her environmental issues and feared a political candidacy could jeopardize the nonprofit tax status of her group.

Since the Aug. 28, primary, though, Smith has been saying she wants to ensure that the vote was fair. On Wednesday, she said an error reported by the town of Walden but not initially accounted for in tallies issued by the secretary of state’s office likely would prompt her to seek a recount.

Condos’ announcement on Wednesday came a day after his office issued official results for the primary held a week earlier. That came at the conclusion of a meeting of an official canvassing committee that certifies election results.

Kaplan had attended that meeting and tried to raise questions about the votes reported from Walden but was rebuffed by Kathleen Scheele, the director of the elections division in Condos’ office. She said she went to the secretary of state’s office on Wednesday, checked election records again and pressed the issue further.

The town clerk’s office in Walden was closed late Wednesday afternoon, and officials there could not be reached.

Kaplan’s inquiries on Wednesday prompted Condos to take the extraordinary step of calling an emergency meeting of the canvassing committee for Thursday at 4 p.m.

“In the rush to complete the August 28th primary canvassing report over the long holiday (Labor Day) weekend, human errors were made in the calculation of write-in votes for the Progressive Gubernatorial race,” Condos said in a statement.

He said the new tally appeared to bring Smith close enough that she is legally eligible to ask for a recount, adding that he hoped a recount could be accomplished quickly so ballots for the November election could be printed by Sept. 21. That’s the federal deadline for mailing them to military and other overseas voters.

Source:  DAVE GRAM, Associated Press | www.greenwichtime.com 5 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky