LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wrong end of telescope 

Credit:  North Devon Journal | via www.power-eng.com 24 August 2012 ~~

Once again Rosemary Brian contributes to the debate on wind turbines (Wind needs no back-up) and presents a cogent argument which concludes “… no additional back-up is needed, it is already there…” However, I cannot help but feel she is looking through the wrong end of the telescope.

The discussion about the need for back-up (or base-load) to support wind generation was spawned by the green lobby. They claimed that every 1 kilowatt of electricity generated by wind turbines would directly result in the saving of 1 kilowatt of electricity generated by fossil fuels. Thus went the argument that quid pro quo savings in carbon emissions would result.

This was deliberately misleading and those who understood the detail of power generation and distribution entered the debate to expose the green argument and present a factual analysis of the situation. That “… no additional back-up is needed…” holds well only as long as the present generating capacity can support the future demands on the system.

The decision to build new nuclear and fossil fuel power stations came as the realisation dawned that we would face serious shortages in the next few years if we simply shut down obsolete plants without creating new capacity to match their loss. Alas wind power alone would not achieve this: thus the need to build new back-up generation.

BOB ASHTON

Bratton Fleming

Source:  North Devon Journal | via www.power-eng.com 24 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky