LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bradford University study confirms wind farms have a major impact 

Credit:  By James Rush | Telegraph & Argus | www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk 22 August 2012 ~~

Environmental groups have warned climate change is the biggest threat to the countryside after researchers suggested wind turbines could affect the tranquillity of rural areas.

Research into tranquillity at the University of Bradford has confirmed while the countryside on the urban fringe can be peaceful, it is threatened by illegal dumping and the presence of wind turbines and that these effects can be quantified.

But environmental groups, including Bradford Friends of the Earth, have agreed wind farms should be “sensitively sited”, but warned that the greatest threat to the countryside was climate change.

The announcement comes after the Bronte Society formally objected to Calderdale Council about proposals by Yorkshire Wind Power to replace turbines at its Ovenden Moor Windfarm with turbines double the size.

Greg Watts, professor of transportation noise at the School of Engineering, Design and Technology at the university and his team carried out a study, which examined environmental features in and around Ogden Water, Country Park and Nature Reserve.

It included recruiting 30 people, aged 18 to 77, who were accompanied by researchers on five-mile walks, asked to stop at various points and make observations on how peaceful settings were.

He said: “We asked people to consider what was tranquil about a particular place and what threatened that tranquillity.

“We found illegal dumping and wind turbines had an adverse effect. It was not only the noise and visual intrusion of the turbines themselves, but the buildings and service roads in and around the site that had probably affected people’s perception of tranquillity. It was this industrialisation of open green spaces that reduced their ability to be restorative.”

Professor Watts will present his findings at a conference this week in New York.

Rob Glover, treasurer of Friends of the Earth Bradford, said onshore wind represented an important step towards reducing carbon emissions and dependence on fossil fuels and tackling climate change.

He said: “However, that must not blind us to just accepting any development anywhere.

“We fully agree that any new windfarm proposal needs to demonstrate through the planning process that the location has been chosen carefully and that impacts on the surrounding environment have been minimised as far as practicable.

“If wind turbines are not sensitively sited, we can lose the support of the public.

“But one of the biggest threats to our countryside is climate change – and this is exactly what wind power alongside other clean energy sources can help defeat.”

Prof Watts said that the factors influencing tranquillity highlighted in the research would benefit planners and conservationists in designing more relaxing environments.

They could use a prediction method devised by researchers which would allow improvements in planning to be quantified.

He said: “When people are surrounded by nature and hear natural sounds rather than mechanical noises they find it easier to relax and to recover from stress.”

Emma Hill, project manager at Bradford Environmental Action Trust, said: “BEAT will be obviously in favour of energy generation from renewable sources but it is about things being in the right place.”

Source:  By James Rush | Telegraph & Argus | www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk 22 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky