LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

£200m island wind farm is axed over risk to birds 

Credit:  David Ross, Highland Correspondent | The Herald | www.heraldscotland.com 9 August 2012 ~~

A major energy company has pulled out of a controversial £200 million wind farm on Lewis because of a risk to golden eagles and other protected birds.

SSE wanted to put 125 turbines on the Pairc Estate in the south-east of the island, but a campaign by residents saw the proposals downsized to 57 turbines – each measuring 500ft – then to just 26.

Despite the concession, opponents argued the scheme still had the potential to harm sensitive bird species – including golden eagles, white-tailed sea eagles, merlin, black-throated diver, golden plover and dunlin.

SSE said it had withdrawn its interest in the site and had “concluded a project of this size is no longer feasible due to environmental constraints, particularly in relation to predicted bird collision risks”.

It is understood there is still potential to bring a wind farm with fewer turbines to the Pairc Estate, but SSE said it had no plans to progress with a smaller development.

David Gardner, SSE’s director of onshore renewables, said: “We are committed to developing onshore wind farms, but as a responsible developer we will only do so if proposals are environmentally sustainable.

“Our studies show that for the size of development we were proposing at Pairc this would not have been the case so we do not plan to progress any further. We do feel there is scope for a smaller development that could benefit the local community.”

Aedan Smith, RSPB Scotland’s head of planning and development, said: “We have been concerned about this proposal for a number of years.

“SSE should be commended on this responsible decision which recognises the importance of this site for sensitive species.

“We hope SSE and other wind farm developers will continue to apply similar consideration to other sites where there are environmental concerns.

“Although much of Lewis is important for wildlife, there is still scope to develop wind farms as long as they are well sited and designed. We withdrew our objection to a 36-turbine Stornoway wind farm, which is on a less sensitive part of Lewis, following efforts by the developer to reduce impacts on wildlife.”

The Pairc wind farm plan is central to a dispute between the landowner and the local crofting community, which is seeking to exercise its rights under land reform legislation to buy the common grazings that form part of the development site.

The community wants the land, with or without the wind farm, and ministers have approved their ownership bid. However, Barry Lomas, the Warwickshire-based accountant who owns the 26,800 acre Pairc Estate, does not want to sell.

He set up a 75-year lease with a subsidiary company which then signed a deal with SSE to erect a wind farm. He has claimed the land reform act breaches his human rights.

The Court of Session is now to decide the issue.

Plans to erect two 112ft-high wind turbines near the historic battlefield of Flodden have been rejected after a public outcry.

Concerns had been raised about the impact they would have on the area at Cornhill-on-Tweed, in Northumberland.

The Battle of Flodden in 1513 was one of Scotland’s worst military defeats – claiming the life of about 12,000 Scots, including King James IV.

Source:  David Ross, Highland Correspondent | The Herald | www.heraldscotland.com 9 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon