LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Architect exposes wind farm CGI dupe 

Credit:  www.bdonline.co.uk 25 July 2012 ~~

A new book out next month claims that computer-generated images of wind farms make the structures look smaller than they actually are.

The book, called Windfarm Visualisation: Perspective or Perception, by Scottish architect Alan Macdonald, who runs Inverness computer-generated image firm Architech, is due to come out next month.

Macdonald, who has worked on close to 50 wind farm projects, said CGIs of how planned wind farms would look are often compromised because they are created from 50mm shots with the turbines in the middle of a panorama.

The architect blamed a trick of the brain for giving the impression of a small development on a large landscape.

“It’s due to the way the brain interprets photographic images, that’s what it boils down to,” he said. “The 50mm shots under represents the landscape scale. A panoramic image can only be viewed from one point. There is an undersizing aspect.”

He dismissed suggestions councils were being conned by CGIs submitted to them as part of the planning application. “It’s not deliberate at all [but] it’s an advantage for the developer.”

He said 75mm shots would give a better representation of landscape scale. In May, a report by Stirling Univeristy on wind farm visualisations said: “Single frame images produced at 75mm focal length should be used in most circumstances.”

Source:  www.bdonline.co.uk 25 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky