| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Plan to double size of windfarm thrown out
Credit: By Cheryl Livingstone | The Press and Journal | www.pressandjournal.co.uk 20 July 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Plans to nearly double the size of a Caithness windfarm were rejected by councillors yesterday because of its impact on the “main tourist route” in the north.
The Forss Windfarm in Caithness, owned by renewable-energy giant RES, is located on part of the former US Navy site at Forss, between Thurso and Dounreay.
The company was first granted planning permission in 2001 for two turbines and they became operational two years later.
In 2006, permission to add four turbines to the site was granted.
Yesterday, however, plans to extend the windfarm for a second time by a further five turbines were recommended for refusal by a planning officer because of the effect on landscape and visual amenity, which he found “unacceptable”. Highland Council’s planning review board agreed following a site visit.
Councillors debated for several hours before deciding unanimously to reject the proposal because of its detrimental effect on visual and landscape amenity.
Committee chairman Councillor Thomas Prag said last night: “This was in effect a proposal to double the size of a windfarm which has already been extended once.
“This would have been a further extension and members were concerned, particularly because it is so close and very visible from the main tourist route in the north of Scotland.”
RES development project manager Graeme Kerr said: “This is a huge disappointment, not only for RES but for the Caithness community. Forss Windfarm already makes an important contribution to the security and sustainability of Scotland’s energy supply, as well as bringing economic benefits to the community.
“The additional five turbines we proposed would have brought further benefits such as jobs for people and an increase in funding to the current community fund which is in place.”
He added that the company now planned to consider its options.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=25952 ]
