LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

‘More spin than a wind turbine blade’ 

Credit:  Fife Today | www.fifetoday.co.uk 5 July 2012 ~~

Cameron Community Council has expressed astonishment at an announcement that a Welsh-based energy company has reached a benefit package agreement with representatives from the village – but has made it clear it is not with the community organisation itself.

West Coast Energy is proposing a controversial windfarm development at Lingo, on farmland north of the B940 between Largoward and Dunino.

Last week, Arncroach and Carnbee Development Trust confirmed it had entered into partnership with WCE with, and on behalf of, the communities of Cameron, Arncroach and Carnbee, Largoward and District, and Boarhills and Dunino.

It followed the earlier announcement by WCE that it had reached agreement over community benefit that would allow investment in local projects should the company’s Lingo windfarm win planning consent.

However, a spokesperson for Cameron Community Council said members were “astounded” by the recent announcements that WCE had come to a community benefit agreement with local representatives.

PROTRACTED

In an exclusive interview, he told the Citizen: ”Last September, following attendance at preliminary meetings with the company, the community council declined to be involved in any community benefit discussions with WCE as the project had not yet got the benefit of a valid planning consent, the site works had not commenced, no electricity was being generated and the time lines in bringing the project to a successful delivery were likely to be fairly protracted.”

For these reasons, he said, they considered that it was “premature” to join a forum to discuss the management and disbursement of funds for the community and to be involved in the establishment of a Communities’ Development Trust.

The spokesperson added: ”The results of a detailed poll of Cameron residents show that the vast majority are against the project and yet the company state that they have an ‘agreement’ in place with the community. For the avoidance of doubt, this so called ‘agreement’ is not with the community council!

DISDAIN

“It is apparent that WCE has treated the community council – the properly elected representatives of the local community – with disdain and contempt. They have ridden roughshod over the democratic process, the views of the community council and the majority of the residents in Cameron.

“Despite this, WCE believe they have an agreement in place? Not for the first time, Cameron Community Council is convinced that West Coast Energy and their PR consultants have more spin than their wind turbines will ever have.”

As revealed in the Citizen, the Lingo windfarm plans have come under fire from Historic Scotland and Scottish Natural Heritage, the heavyweights joining the ever-growing list of objectors – including four community councils – to the proposals to instal a capacity of 12.5MW consisting of five 102-metre high turbines and with an individual blade length of 40 metres, on a line running west to east at Lingo and South Kinaldy Farms.

The community councils of Cameron, Carnbee and Arncroach, Boarhills and Dunino and St Andrews are against the proposals and the level of opposition of more than 400 objections has buoyed members of the local campaign group, STACK – Stop Turbines At Cameron/Kinaldy – who are fighting the windfarm project.

Source:  Fife Today | www.fifetoday.co.uk 5 July 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon