LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Complaints at Windy Hill: Wind farm noise order 

Credit:  Tony Stickley | The Weekend Post | 16 June 2012 ~~

The operator of a 20-turbine wind farm at Windy Hill near Ravenshoe has been told to check noise levels at neighbouring properties.

Under the conditions for approval imposed by the old Herberton Shire Council in 1999, noise monitoring was supposed to be carried out periodically.

In April, the Tablelands Regional Council told the operators of the wind farm, Ratch Australia, that “council officers cannot find evidence which confirms that the requirements of these conditions have been complied with”.

Their finding follows a complaint last year from a local resident about noise from the turbines.

Ratch was then told to carry out a three-month monitoring of the local resident’s property.

Its expert’s noise report, which the council recently received, has been forwarded to the TRC’s own acoustic consultants for peer review.

The report is not yet publicly available.

According to last week’s council minutes, councillors told officials to ensure the outstanding monitoring of other dwellings in the vicinity of the wind farm was carried out “in a timely manner”.

A council spokesperson said: “We have told Ratch to go out and do the monitoring of the other dwellings which was part of the original approval.”

Mayor Rosa Lee Long said the TRC had been in control since 2008 and could only take responsibility since that time.

Ratch Australia’s CEO Steve Loxton said his company would provide information on monitoring.

However, he added: “We are confident the wind farm is operating within the requirements of its permit conditions.”

Source:  Tony Stickley | The Weekend Post | 16 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky