LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

FAA employees noted political aspects of proposed offshore wind farm 

Credit:  AERO News Network | www.aero-news.net 16 June 2012 ~~

FAA documents obtained by opponents of a proposed wind farm off the coast of Cape Cod seem to indicate disagreement about the best course of action for mitigating radar interference from the wind turbines, as well as perceived political pressure to approve the project.

That approval was overturned by an appeals court last year. The Associated Press reports that an e-mail sent by an unnamed engineer after that decision indicated that low-flying aircraft were in danger from the turbines when operating under VFR conditions.

The documents were obtained by the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, a group strongly opposed to the Cape Wind project. Some internal memos show FAA staff referring to the project as “extremely” or “highly” political. One internal presentation reads “It would be very difficult politically to refuse approval of this project.”

The FAA said that employee opinions expressed in internal documents do not represent the official position of the agency. The documents do not indicate that managers steered employees to specific findings based on politics. One said that an iron-clad, thorough response to the radar concerns was vital given congressional interest in the project.

Randy Babbitt, who was FAA administrator at the time the FAA approved the Cape Wind project, had at one time been an advisor to the group working against the program.

Source:  AERO News Network | www.aero-news.net 16 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky