LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Campaigners say revised Array plans ‘still a disaster’ 

Credit:  Tony Gussin, North Devon Gazette, www.northdevongazette.co.uk 6 June 2012 ~~

News the Atlantic Array offshore wind farm development will be reduced to a maximum of 278 turbines cuts no ice with campaigners.

Acceptance of the proposed Atlantic Array offshore wind farm seems no closer after campaigners claimed the recently revised plans would still be ‘a disaster’ for North Devon.

The announcement by developer RWE npower renewables that it would be scaling back the maximum number of turbines proposed from 417 to 278 has been met with scepticism by opposition group Slay the Array.

“The plan on the table is the same as before – but with one option removed,” said Slay the Array spokesman Steve Crowther.

“The previous proposal said they would use 417 big, 300 huge or 188 massive turbines to create a theoretical capacity of 1,500 megawatts. All they’ve done is remove the smaller turbine option.”

The group claimed the company would now use larger turbines of up to 722 feet in height.

Councillor Rodney Cann, North Devon Council’s lead member for the environment called the move a ‘cynical tactic to soften up the people of North Devon’.

“This is really quite a normal tactic. Developers come forward with a monstrous proposal and then come back to us at a later date with what is still an enormous proposal.”

The Gazette put this to the developers. Robert Thornhill, development manager for the Array said they had always said they would apply for planning permission for turbines between 3.6 and eight megawatts.

“The sizes of turbine we are considering have not changed,” he said.

“We have however reduced the maximum number for which we will apply for planning consent from 417 to 278 following responses to our public consultation and our environmental and engineering studies to date.”

Mr Thornhill said they still sought a development with up to 1,500MW capacity but had ‘significantly reduced’ the horizontal view of the wind farm from the closest points of North Devon by approximately 40 per cent, from 414 to 238 square kilometres.

But Mr Crowther said the announcement ‘was a ploy to make it look as though developers had bowed to public opinion’.

“In fact, they have not reduced the size of the development at all. Like the ‘extra’ consultation they announced in January, this is part of a carefully choreographed PR campaign,” he said.

“The closest point to the North Devon coast is 8.7 miles away – that’s the same distance as from Fullabrook to Huntshaw Cross.

“Everyone in North Devon knows how visible the Fullabrook turbines are from right around the estuary basin – and these turbines will be twice the size of the ones at Fullabrook.”

Cllr Cann added: “It’s still a totally outrageous proposal and it is still going to impact on the character of North Devon. Instead of rolling Atlantic views, we will get industrial landscapes. There will be an impact on tourism, it will affect marine life and there will be a loss of fishing grounds.

“The impact on North Devon is still negative. It is my belief that investment here is foolhardy in-so-much that in five years’ time there will be alternative forms of renewable energy that are far more acceptable and that don’t damage the environment.”

Source:  Tony Gussin, North Devon Gazette, www.northdevongazette.co.uk 6 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon