LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Akron-Westfield Community School District will consider selling wind turbine 

Credit:  By Aaron Adelson, www.kcautv.com 5 April 2012 ~~

A giant wind turbine that generates power and pumps money into the Akron-Westfield School District is now broken.

The cost to fix it runs in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

So what will the district do?

The Akron-Westfield Community School District finds itself in a bit of a catch-22, while the wind turbine stands not moving, it’s costing the district money, but to fix it might cost too much money.

This wind turbine, built in 19-9 is probably one of the most notable landmarks in Akron, Iowa.

It’s older than many of the children in the Akron-Westfield School District.

The district earned $38,000 a year while the turbine generated electricity, but it broke in November.

To fix it, would cost about $150,000.

So the school district will consider selling it.

“Probably the preference would be to keep it on site if we can, because it’s become part of the identity of Akron,” Larry Williams, Akron-Westfield Superintendent.

Dwain Wilmot’s father led the effort to build the wind turbine.

“I used to step out my front door, and look up the street, and I could see it, and I’d say oh yea, the winds blowing out of the South today,” said Wilmot.

Wilmot’s father passed away before any of the problems arose. The turbine’s already been repaired more than once. The district can only repair it with money from the general fund, which has the least wiggle room.

“Do we risk $160,000 against the possibility that we would have a long range return in a year when we’re already having to lay off staff just to make ends meet? It doesn’t up doing that very readily,” said Williams.

Wilmot says his father would understand the situation, but would hope for a solution that could keep the turbine where it is.

“He would be feeling the same way I am. A little disappointed, a little sad, but understanding why things are happening the way they are,” said Wilmot.

Source:  By Aaron Adelson, www.kcautv.com 5 April 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky