LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind project appeal dropped 

Credit:  Neal P. Goswami, New England Newspapers, www.thetranscript.com 24 March 2012 ~~

SEARSBURG, Vt. – The Green Mountain Club has withdrawn an appeal of the Deerfield Wind project after the U.S. Forest Service agreed to require the use of radar-activated lights on wind turbines.

The project proposed by Deerfield Wind, LLC, a subsidiary of the Spanish company Iberdrola Renewables, calls for 15 wind turbines nearly 400 feet high and spaced a half-mile apart on the ridgelines to the west of Route 8 in Readsboro and east of Route 8 in Searsburg.

Together, the turbines are expected to produce 30 megawatts of power.

Green Mountain Club Executive Director Will Wiquist said the club, which oversees the Long Trail in Vermont, filed initial comments before the Public Service Board approved the project in 2009. A second round of comments filed by the club earlier this year focused on lighting of the wind turbines.

“We thought it was very important that the view from the Long Trail and the Appalachian Trail Š have no view of flashing lights,” Wiquist said.

The club worked with the Forest Service, upon whose land the turbines will be sited, and the Appalachian Trail Conservancy to alter the PSB’s previous order. The amended order now requires radar-activated lighting that will only trigger lights when aircraft approach.

Wiquist said the new order will benefit hikers and campers who are near the turbines.

“We just got confirmation from them this week and we’ve withdrawn our appeal.
We’re really happy the Forest Service worked with us on this. If the project goes forward it will really minimize the impact on the trail,” he said.

The club has not taken an official position on the wind project itself, according to Wiquist.

He said they are neither backing or opposing it. However, the club has asked the PSB to require a decommission plan, and require the developer to pay for all decommissioning costs.

Source:  Neal P. Goswami, New England Newspapers, www.thetranscript.com 24 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon