LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Daugaard vetoes tax refunds for energy projects 

Credit:  David Montgomery, Journal staff, Rapid City Journal, rapidcityjournal.com 16 March 2012 ~~

Gov. Dennis Daugaard has vetoed an economic development bill that gave tax subsidies to power companies.

The measure, HB1228, was a last-minute proposal in the legislative session. It gave automatic tax refunds to large wind energy projects, and to large environmental projects at traditional power plants.

The latter clause was aimed at helping the Big Stone power plant in northeast South Dakota with a planned upgrade.

In his veto message, Daugaard said HB1228 had many flaws, which he said derived from the haste with which it was assembled.

“This legislation… was not fully and completely vetted,” Daugaard wrote in his message.

Saying the bill would also benefit electricity customers in neighboring states, Daugaard urged lawmakers to take the time “to determine whether tax breaks to benefit citizens of other states is the best use of (scarce state) dollars.”

The governor also criticized the requirement that projects be worth at least $50 million to qualify. Some smaller proposed projects, like a 20-megawatt wind farm planned near Belle Fourche, would not qualify under HB1228.

Daugaard also said the Legislature shouldn’t pass a new economic development plan until the voters decide on his own plan. The Legislature approved an economic development grant fund proposed by the governor last year, but the South Dakota Democratic Party referred it to a popular vote this November.

“I am committed to working with stakeholders in the energy arena to develop mechanisms to incentivize their industry,” Daugaard said in the statement. “However, HB1228 is the wrong mechanism at the wrong time.”

Legislators will convene in Pierre on Monday to consider Daugaard’s veto. It takes a two-third majority to override a veto – 24 votes in the Senate and 47 votes in the House of Representatives.

HB1228 passed the House with 52 votes, but only got 18 votes in the Senate.

Source:  David Montgomery, Journal staff, Rapid City Journal, rapidcityjournal.com 16 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon