LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge open to further consideration of turbine lawsuit 

Credit:  By Brian Boyd, www.southcoasttoday.com 9 March 2012 ~~

NEW BEDFORD – A Bristol County Superior Court judge is giving the opposing sides in the Fairhaven wind turbines lawsuit a chance to submit additional arguments, ensuring the legal battle will remain alive for the time being.

In January, Judge Thomas F. McGuire Jr. threw out two of four counts in a lawsuit that Fairhaven residents filed to stop the town’s wind turbine project. The lawyer for one of the defendants, the developer Fairhaven Wind, argued in court Thursday against the remaining counts.

In trying to get the suit dismissed, Thaddeus Heuer, Fairhaven Wind’s attorney, said the plaintiffs did not have a right to sue under the principle that says the public can force officials to fulfill clear obligations.

The principle, known as mandamus, applies to situations where, for example, a town clerk refuses to issue a license even if the applicant meets the criteria, he said.

“Here we don’t have that situation,” said Heuer, who made the defendants’ case while the town’s lawyer, Thomas Crotty, sat next to him.

McGuire said in his January decision that plaintiffs did not explain how they would be harmed by wind turbines or what specific risks they face. To stop the project mid-stream, he said he must find both a likelihood of success in their motion and that they would be irreparably harmed by the turbines.

At the same time, McGuire said the claim that selectmen did not have the authority to lease lot 9 to Fairhaven Wind has merit. According to the complaint, Town Meeting gave selectmen authority to lease two lots at the Arsene Street site, neither of which were lot 9. The final lease with Fairhaven Wind includes lot 9.

During Thursday’s hearing, the residents’ lawyer, Ann M. Ponichtera DeNardis, defended her clients’ case and their right to bring the lawsuit. She said the lease had undergone dramatic changes, officials did not act transparently, and there is clear evidence of harm, including loss of property values.

“The complaint should be allowed to proceed,” she told the judge.

McGuire did not set another court date, but said lawyers for the two sides could submit more documents for him to consider.

Source:  By Brian Boyd, www.southcoasttoday.com 9 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon