LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Woodford OKs longer setbacks for wind farm towers 

Credit:  By Cheryl Wolfe, www.pantagraph.com 4 March 2012 ~~

EUREKA – Developers of wind energy will have longer setbacks for towers if they choose to come to Woodford County.

The Woodford County Board voted 8-7 to approve the measure. About 90 people showed up for the board meeting, held last week, and about a dozen spoke in opposition to the changes.

The setback was increased from 750 feet to four times the height of the turbine. Backers said the change was needed to protect non-participating landowners from having turbines too close to their property.

“This is just protecting those who choose not to participate,” board member Shannon Rocke said. “This will not keep wind out of this county. Property rights to me are a big deal.”

But the people who spoke out against the changes and other board members disagreed.

“There’s no way any future wind farm will come here,” said Farrell Lord. “If you don’t care about other counties, you should care about the money.”

Board member Larry Whitaker said the wind farms are the new economic development and represent more funding for schools and the county, more jobs and more tax income.

Board member John Krug said the longer setback amounting to about 1,600 feet is not the same as in other contiguous counties, where setbacks are 1,250 to 1,500 feet.

Board member Doug Huser who chaired the CP&Z Committee that wrote the changes said several compromises were made during the process and the committee did a lot of research before presenting its recommendations to the Zoning Board of Appeals where they garnered large support.

“We’re not here to kill wind,” Huser said.

Voting in favor of the longer setbacks were Russ Cotton, Stan Glazier, Tom Evans, Doug Huser, Duane Kingdon, Barry Logan, Andrew Martin and Shannon Rocke.

Voting against the proposal were Don Cremeens, Mike Hinrichsen, Tom Janssen, Tom Karr, John Krug, Terry Pille and Larry Whitaker.

Source:  By Cheryl Wolfe, www.pantagraph.com 4 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky