LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Umatilla County wind rules on the table for comment 

Credit:  By SAMANTHA TIPLER, East Oregonian, www.eastoregonian.com 18 February 2012 ~~

Anyone waiting to chime in on Umatilla County’s June 2011 laws for siting wind turbines and the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals’ ruling remanding a portion of those new rules, will have their chance to speak at a public hearing at the end of the month.

The county board of commissioners will take public testimony, but only testimony having to do with the specific issues in the board of appeals remand, said Umatilla County Planning Director Tamra Mabbott.

“They won‟t take testimony on general stuff like „wind is good‟ or „wind is bad,‟” Mabbott said. “The county clearly adopted a policy in support of wind development.”

On Jan. 12 the board of appeals remanded four points back to the county. Now the county must adopt new wording to explain its reasons for the laws.

The first of those issues involves the process for waiving a two-mile setback between homes and wind turbines. Mabbott emphasized LUBA did not disagree with the two-mile setback. It disagreed with the process the county had proposed for a landowner or a city to waive that setback.

In a memo Mabbott and County Counsel Doug Olsen give four options to the commissioners.

The memo recommends the commissioners make no changes to the county‟s rules, but allows the current variance process to work for wind turbines as it does for any other land use case.

“We have a standard variance process that applies to any of our code provisions,” Mabbott said. “That would be the fallback position, if you will, if we didn’t have another process that would be
unique for siting wind turbines.”

Mabbott said her department also will give a proposal on how to address the need for an environmental, social, economic and energy analysis, which the board of appeals asked the county to complete at least in part.

The planning department also will report on how the county‟s comprehensive plan agrees with the new wind turbine siting rules.

While Mabbott was hopeful the commissioners could get through all the issues in one day, she said they could refer some issues that need more work back to the Umatilla County Planning Commission.

Source:  By SAMANTHA TIPLER, East Oregonian, www.eastoregonian.com 18 February 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon