| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Tidal energy better bet than wind farms
Credit: The Portland Press Herald, www.pressherald.com 6 February 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
After reading the article “Professor: Wind projects could boost Maine’s economy” in the Jan. 23 Portland Press Herald, I do not understand why the University of Maine has not devoted more time and money from grants to further developing tidal power as an energy source.
The university has spent a tremendous amount of effort to promote wind energy, which is not nearly as efficient as, and much more costly than, tidal energy.
The $20 billion effort to build a wind farm 20 miles offshore, which professor Habib Dagher is proposing, needs greater thought. Half of this $20 billion would produce many more kilowatts if put toward tidal energy rather than wind farms. Any wind power development will have to be subsidized by Maine taxpayers and electric ratepayers for the next few decades.
Wind energy requires very expensive large towers on land, or platforms on the ocean, to support the turbines. If the proposed wind farm is 20 miles offshore, it will require laying undersea water cables to shore, another large construction expense. Wind does not blow consistently, and many times not at all.
Tidal power, on the other hand, relies on the rising and falling of the tides, which has been happening daily and consistently since the Earth began. Tidal-powered turbines are far more reliable than wind-powered turbines.
Tidal turbines are economical to maintain once installed under water, and the electricity output is completely predictable. The tremendous force that the water exerts compared to wind reduces the size of tidal turbines.
Tidal turbines placed on the ocean floor do not interfere with shipping lanes. Turbines could also be placed in Maine’s major rivers without obstructing river traffic.
I believe that our governor, legislators and Maine citizens should carefully weigh the merits of each system.
Fernand LaRochelle
retired mechanical engineer
Westbrook
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=18775 ]
