LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Blow for wind scheme 

Credit:  Hull Daily Mail, www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk 17 December 2011 ~~

Countryside campaigners are applauding East Riding Council for standing in the way of a Yorkshire Wolds wind farm plan.

Despite being advised to approve it, councillors rejected an application by Gaoh Energy to put up a 60m wind monitoring mast at Nafferton. They said it would have too much impact on the open countryside.

The structure would have been the forerunner to four proposed 125m turbines.

The No To Wolds Windfarm Group is supported by well-known figures, such as Yorkshire artist David Hockney, who lives near there and takes inspiration from surrounding area.

Following the unexpected planning decision, group chairman Steve Hey said: “I applaud the councillors for sending out the message that industrial wind farms are not welcome on the Yorkshire Wolds.”

But he said he expects the applicant to appeal and says the rules should be changed to stop local council decisions being overturned by the planning inspectorate.

“The East Riding has done its bit for renewables up to 2020, which was the target,” said My Hey.

“Anything above that should be decided by local politicians.”

The campaign also argues that companies wanting to build wind farms should have to apply for outline planning permission at the outset.

Currenty, there is a two-stage approach where they initially apply for a less intrusive wind-monitoring mast.

East Riding planning officers had said the application should be approved because the mast would be slim, temporary and have a minimal impact on the landscape.

Source:  Hull Daily Mail, www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk 17 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon