LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Energy Committee recommends against wind turbine site 

Credit:  By ROBERT BARBOZA, Editor, www.southcoasttoday.com 14 December 2011 ~~

WESTPORT – The Westport Energy Committee told Selectmen Monday night that they would not be recommending that the town pursue the installation of a commercial-sized wind turbine on a site behind the fire station at 54 Hix Bridge Road.

The committee presented a 71-page summary of the feasibility study conducted by Atlantic Design Engineering which indicated that a small turbine would not generate enough revenue to pay for itself, while a larger turbine at that location would have too great a negative impact on the neighborhood.

Inadequate setbacks, public opposition, and potential noise, flicker and visual concerns all make the town forest land “not suitable for a utility scale wind turbine,” said Energy Committee Chairman Antone Vieira, Jr., who is the Board of Selectmen’s delegate to the committee.

The Energy Committee received three petitions opposing the location from hundreds of residents and parishioners at St. John the Baptist Church at last month’s public hearing on the feasibility study.

Vieira indicated the Energy Committee, which recently voted 5-0 not to recommend the 54 Hix Bridge Road property, would now begin exploring other potential sites for a municipal turbine, including the nearby capped landfill.

While the Energy Committee has considered other possible sites in town in the past, including the landfill, those other locations were not “seriously studied,” suggested member Ed Goldberg.

The landfill on Hix Bridge Road is being eyed as a potential location for a solar energy farm, with the town prepared to issue a Request for Proposals (RFPs) for private companies to lease a portion of the site for a solar panel installation on Dec. 21, interim Town Administrator Jack Healey reported. The deadline for submitting RFPs will be Feb. 4, he said.

Chairman of Selectmen Richard Spirlet is optimistic about a solar array being built at the landfill, suggesting the chance to buy energy at a discount and collect taxes on the array would be “a win-win for us.”

Also coming up on the Energy Committee agenda will be a possible net metering agreement with EMI Solar Systems for the town to buy up to one megawatt of power per year from the 50-acre solar energy farm EMI is building in North Dartmouth. Dartmouth officials recently signed a similar agreement to purchase six megawatts of power per year from the project.

EMI representative Jack Arruda told selectmen the company was willing to install additional solar panels on available land at the Dartmouth site to accommodate Westport’s needs if an agreement could be reached. He also indicated the company might be interested in submitting a proposal for a solar installation at the Westport landfill.

Selectmen met in executive session earlier Monday evening with special counsel Attorney Richard Holland for an update on the EMI negotiations. The attorney indicated an agreement was “very close” to being completed, with a few details remaining to be worked out.

Atty. Holland indicated the net metering agreement would assign power generated by the solar farm to be “credited” to Westport’s utility bills from NSTAR.

Healey said the proposed 20-year contract with EMI “could save us about 10 percent of our annual electric bill.” The town uses almost two megawatts of power for its municipal buildings each year, it was noted.

Source:  By ROBERT BARBOZA, Editor, www.southcoasttoday.com 14 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon