LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Administration official: wind energy bill preserves local control 

Credit:  By State House News Service / State Capitol Briefs, bosonherald.com 7 December 2011 ~~

A day after Senate President Therese Murray indicated job-creating wind energy siting reform legislation will need “clear language about local control and siting standards” to advance, a Patrick administration official said pending proposals include such provisions. “This bill in my opinion really does not undermine local control,” Steven Clarke, the state’s assistant secretary for energy, told the News Service. Bill supporters say it consolidates and streamlines approval processes land-based wind energy developers must clear, while retaining the ability of local officials to reject proposals. Clarke also noted the pending reform bill also allows cities and towns to charge developers a mitigation fee. The bill gives communities an initial 60-day window to consider whether project applications are complete and then a four-month period to make a decision on an application, with local permitting review handled in community’s with significant wind resources by a proposed Wind Permitting Board that would feature representatives from local conservation commission, planning board and zoning boards. Projects approved at the local level could be appealed under the bill to the state Energy Facilities Siting Board and to the Supreme Judicial Court. Clarke said Patrick administration officials hoped to advance a bill based on one produced by a six-member conference committee and approved by the House and Senate before falling one procedural Senate vote shy of reaching Patrick’s desk last year. Murray on Tuesday called for stronger assurances that cities and towns would have the ability under the legislation to protect residential areas where wind turbines may not be wanted. “After continuing to learn more about local control and the siting decisions of individual towns, the Senate President expects that for any legislation to go forward, it must have clear language about local control and siting standards that protect residential areas,” a Murray spokesman said in a statement to the News Service. Heading into the second year of the two-year legislative session, wind siting reform bills remain pending before the Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy Committee.

Source:  By State House News Service / State Capitol Briefs, bosonherald.com 7 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon