LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Pass on wind 

Credit:  The Islander, www.theislanderonline.com.au 24 November 2011 ~~

The Kangaroo Island Council and KI Eco Action have joined forces to oppose a State Government edict which makes it easier to build wind farms on Kangaroo Island.

The State government has issued an interim Development Plan Amendment which applies to wind farms statewide and asked for comment by December 13.

It aims “to provide greater clarity for the development of wind farm facilities, by recognising them as an envisaged form of development in some zone with relatively low population densities… and many need to be in prominent locations to take advantage of the wind,” according to a report prepared by the Kangaroo Island Council’s chief executive officer Andrew Boardman for the November meeting of the council.

Many councillors spoke of their concerns about wind farm development on Kangaroo

Island and a letter from KI Eco Action was tabled as late correspondence.

Cr Peter Denholm said that in accordance with the council’s development plan all wind farms should be a category 3 development

(requiring public consultation) not category 2 as proposed in the State Government’s plan

(category 2 development has no right of appeal). He said the government’s plan was a “quickie” and “all development on coast and

conservation zones whould be category 3”.

Bob Huxtable, on behalf of KI Eco Action, asked the council to express its concerns about the change in development status for wind farms, the reduction of setbacks from residences from 2km to 1km and that any wind farms be placed close to existing cable infrastructure.

Cr Deholm said the viability of wind energy on Kangaroo Island was questionable given the island’s low energy needs.

Cr Peter Clements agreed and said evidence from overseas raised issues about breakdown, lifecycle cost and low investment returns.

Cr Graham Walkom said people had “become emotional about how wonderful wind farms are”. He cited issues affecting birds and wildlife and “their failure and unfunded removal issues”.

Cr Walkom warned that if wind farms became easier to build, investors would be attracted to Kangaroo Island , which “puts us at risk of having hundreds if not thousands of these things” with investors offering to upgrade the island’s main power cable to sell power to the mainland.

Cr Malcolm Boxall argued for a bigger buffer zone from residences.

Cr Rosalie Chirgwin said she was also concerned about wind farms in the primary production zones, not just coastal and conservation.

“This is an issue causing civic unrest and resistance (elsewhere).

“I’m not in favour of wind towers on KI and we should send a strong message,” she said.

Mayor Jayne Bates said the council could not stop wind farms but could voice its oppostiton to their classification as category 2.

The council resolved to advise the Minister of its opposition relating to the promotion of wind farms in the Coastal Conservation, Conservation and Water Protection zones on Kangaroo Island and that there be a 2km buffer zone from residences in the Primary Production Zone.

Resident Lara Tilbrook had expressed her concerns about the environmental impacts and fire risks of wind turbines during “Questions from the Gallery”.

Another gallery member, former councillor Scott McDonald, said later that the council resolution was a “landmark decsion” to try to protect coastal zones from developemnt.

Source:  The Islander, www.theislanderonline.com.au 24 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky